Tariffs and HBS: Q&A with Andy O’Brien
|
by Shona Simkin ![]() With tariffs back in the daily news headlines, we talked with Andy O’Brien, chief of Operations, about their potential effects on Harvard Business School. What are examples of how tariffs are affecting HBS Operations? We’ve also got some major construction projects underway on campus this summer, with all kinds of different products needed to complete the work. We buy in the US when we can, but the products and materials we use come from all over the world—air handling units, elevators, doors, windows, light fixtures, and so on. We hire a construction manager to supervise the construction and coordinate all the purchasing on the project. They in turn contract with various sub-contractors, vendors, and suppliers for all the goods and services. The tariffs only apply to the goods (materials and products) purchased, not on the services provided. How are you approaching those expenses? Because we have so many different service contracts, I've asked everyone on my team to let us know what products are being tariffed and what the tariff costs are. That means asking the vendors to show us exactly where they're paying the tariff—we don’t want to see a price escalation with a short explanation “additional tariff cost.” Many firms have built up stockpiles during the pause, and if we're buying from their stockpile, we shouldn't be paying a tariff. We’re fine paying an extra amount if they're paying it, but they have to prove what those expenses are. We’ll also shift where we buy things from. Right now, there are a lot of products outside the United States that are better purchases—we always try to buy at the most reasonable price that we can. For example, steel in the United States is more expensive than in Canada, so it used to be less expensive to buy it in Canada and ship it down. Luckily for us, a lot of stuff can be sourced in the US, so we can avoid tariffs in many cases. Restaurant Associates manages our food services on campus, so we use their purchasing power through a subsidiary, FoodBuy. FoodBuy purchases more food than Harvard does, so because of their scale it’s to our benefit to do our food purchasing through them. It’s very hard to budget for tariffs because we don’t know what they are yet, and because different components of purchases are subject to different tariffs. What are the different types of tariffs, and how are we exposed to them? How does HBS use a commodity like steel? Aluminum is another one—it’s in soda cans, door frames, and equipment we use on campus. We buy windows, doors, door hardware, and light fixtures. Even things like a carpet, which you might think wouldn’t be affected, have commodity components from China that could have a tariff. Furniture has all different types of components—wood, plastic, metal, all of which could have tariffs. It’s a lot to unwind and figure out. How is the University approaching this? Has it been helpful to us at HBS? For example, Harvard University buys more paper towels than a lot of other organizations, so we benefit from those prices. We can also stockpile items and keep them all in storage at the provider’s warehouse. We’ll pull from that Harvard inventory until it’s gone. What are some of the biggest challenges? It’s been interesting to see all the different dynamics in the negotiations. There are supposedly agreements with the UK, China, and Vietnam, but the details haven’t been shared yet. There are a lot of unknowns. I always expect something crazy to happen. Scheduling and timing are also difficult. A supply chain ripple can have a major effect on both cost and schedule. For example, if we need to buy 600 wood windows, the contractor will give us a fixed price. Then they have to manufacture the windows, and their wood source now charges 25 percent more. They have some stockpiled wood for a portion of the order, so they shop around to find the rest of the wood that can meet the bid price. But everyone is doing something similar, so the less expensive wood is now getting more expensive. They could wait an extra 60 days for the new stock to come in, but that would delay delivery of the windows. The windows make the building weather-tight so that you can do the interior construction. The end result is a slowdown in the supply chain, which can cause an increase in cost, a decrease in quality, and for sure a lot of uncertainty in the system. We deal with these types of issues quite frequently, but lately it has been at a level of complexity, across such a broad spectrum of supply chains, that is much more than what we have ever experienced. You’ve been here for 20 years—have you faced this kind of challenge before? Is there anything else you want the community to know? |
Post a Comment
Comments must be on-topic and civil in tone (with no name calling or personal attacks). Any promotional language or urls will be removed immediately. Your comment may be edited for clarity and length.
