Behind the Research: Marlous van Waijenburg
by Shona Simkin What sparked Marlous van Waijenburg’s interest in Africa’s economic development, and what excites her about this line of research? We talked with van Waijenburg, an assistant professor in the Business, Government, and International Economy Unit who teaches in the first year MBA required curriculum, about her work and what she likes to do in her spare time. What is your area of research? What are you working on now? I look at the records that come from the cash sources, but what makes my study different is that I also take into account the role of invisible taxes, most notably in the form of labor coercion. Forced labor is an implicit form of taxation because it doesn’t show up on the expenditure side, but the state uses it and then it also doesn’t show up on the revenue side. What does that tell us about the comparative nature and state of colonial state building? What differences and similarities do we see? I do this for about 30 British and French former territories. I try to give a long run understanding of why African tax systems are one of the weakest in the world—how it has taken shape and where we are in the process. How did you become interested in Africa’s economic development patterns? Sometimes answering one question leads you to another question and another, and the more I started working on Africa the more I became convinced that it was one of the most interesting parts of the world to work on. In part because our knowledge is more limited, so we can ask bigger questions—in that sense it’s very much a research frontier and it’s a challenging region to work on. Compared to other parts of the world, written records are limited and the data is always problematic. I work on the colonial period, so I have to be very mindful of the data I use and think about their biases. I like the challenge of that kind of work and what it teaches me. How do you find data if there are so few records? As an economic historian, we always have to be alert to what kind of data we use and what the biases may be. We know that some colonial statistics—agricultural output and population censuses—are notoriously unreliable. Colonial governments needed to do basic bookkeeping, so tax records from France and Britain are fairly reliable data. While I certainly work with research assistants, I make sure to do a lot of the data work myself as well, especially with sensitive statistics that require human choices. There can be weeks and months that I spend behind spreadsheets—I personally love that time, it’s like a slow process discovery. I learn a lot while I’m working in the spreadsheets and in the archives. I go to the colonial archives in Senegal, London, and Aix en Provence, and take tons of pictures—I observe what’s going on and a narrative starts forming in my head. It’s the same when I enter data, I notice right away if something stands out and I can make notes of it—as you work with the data it starts telling you a story. And then at some point your data is ready and you get to make that first figure and it’s addictive—I don’t know why I love it so much.
What do you like to do outside of work?
|
Post a Comment
Comments must be on-topic and civil in tone (with no name calling or personal attacks). Any promotional language or urls will be removed immediately. Your comment may be edited for clarity and length.