Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Faculty & Research
  • Faculty
  • Research
  • Featured Topics
  • Academic Units
  • …→
  • Harvard Business School→
  • Faculty & Research→
Publications
Publications
  • June 2023
  • Article
  • American Sociological Review

How New Ideas Diffuse in Science

By: Mengjie Cheng, Daniel Scott Smith, Xiang Ren, Hancheng Cao, Sanne Smith and Daniel A. McFarland
  • | Pages:40
ShareBar

Abstract

What conditions help new ideas spread? Can knowledge entrepreneurs’ position and develop new ideas in ways that help them take off? Most innovation research focuses on products and their reference. That focus ignores the ideas themselves and the broader ideational context. Lost are cultural conditions, concept-relations reflecting ideational use, and basic qualities of the ideas themselves. To study how new ideas spread, we use a sample of 18 million texts drawn from STEM and non-STEM fields in the Web of Science (WoS 1900-2016). We extract concepts from these texts as instantiations of ideas using a novel automated phrase mining framework (AutoPhrase) and focus on nearly 200,000 new concepts that emerged from 1992-2016. Using multi-level growth models, we predict the cumulative usage of these concepts as a function of the conditions surrounding their birth and successive usage. We find an idea’s reception is greatly affected by the evolving conditions and efforts of scholars. New scientific concepts have an identifiable “recipe” for success. They spread when they are championed by large teams of authors who reuse them; when the concept is seeded in multiple disciplines; and when the concept is dissimilar to existing terms and placed in cultural holes.

Keywords

Innovation Adoption; Natural Language Processing; Knowledge; Science; Innovation and Invention; Knowledge Sharing; Analytics and Data Science

Citation

Cheng, Mengjie, Daniel Scott Smith, Xiang Ren, Hancheng Cao, Sanne Smith, and Daniel A. McFarland. "How New Ideas Diffuse in Science." American Sociological Review 88, no. 3 (June 2023): 522–561.
  • Find it at Harvard
  • Purchase

More from the Authors

    • July 2025
    • Management Science

    Reputation Burning: Analyzing the Impact of Brand Sponsorship on Social Influencers

    By: Mengjie Cheng and Shunyuan Zhang
    • 2025
    • Faculty Research

    Balancing Engagement and Polarization: Multi-Objective Alignment of News Content Using LLMs

    By: Mengjie Cheng, Elie Ofek and Hema Yoganarasimhan
    • 2025
    • Faculty Research

    The Value of Silence: The Effect of UMG’s Licensing Dispute with TikTok on Music Demand

    By: Mengjie (Magie) Cheng, Elie Ofek and Hema Yoganarasimhan
More from the Authors
  • Reputation Burning: Analyzing the Impact of Brand Sponsorship on Social Influencers By: Mengjie Cheng and Shunyuan Zhang
  • Balancing Engagement and Polarization: Multi-Objective Alignment of News Content Using LLMs By: Mengjie Cheng, Elie Ofek and Hema Yoganarasimhan
  • The Value of Silence: The Effect of UMG’s Licensing Dispute with TikTok on Music Demand By: Mengjie (Magie) Cheng, Elie Ofek and Hema Yoganarasimhan
ǁ
Campus Map
Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
→Map & Directions
→More Contact Information
  • Make a Gift
  • Site Map
  • Jobs
  • Harvard University
  • Trademarks
  • Policies
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College.