Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Faculty & Research
  • Faculty
  • Research
  • Featured Topics
  • Academic Units
  • …→
  • Harvard Business School→
  • Faculty & Research→
Publications
Publications
  • June 2022
  • Technical Note
  • HBS Case Collection

Business Implications from Regulating Carbon Emissions in the EU

By: George Serafeim and Benjamin Maletta
  • Format:Print
  • | Language:English
  • | Pages:48
ShareBar

Abstract

In the beginning of the 21st century, the European Union (the EU) had led the global fight against climate change with a wide array of policy measures. The EU’s primary approach to climate policy had been taxation via the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the first carbon cap-and-trade regulation. EU ETS was a market-based solution designed to reduce GHG emissions by setting an upper limit on domestic emissions. However, the effectiveness of EU ETS had been debated since its inception in 2005. Years later in July 2021, the EU proposed implementation of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), a carbon border tax intended to address business competition challenges plaguing EU ETS by establishing comparable carbon costs within EU borders for imports and local goods. Nevertheless, the CBAM proposal was also met with considerable skepticism. The potential enforcement of CBAM raised several questions for cement and steel producers around the world. First, what would be the impact on their strategies and financial performance? Second, what actions could they take in response? Stakeholders in other industries that relied on cement and steel to produce their own goods pondered the same questions. In addition, several questions emerged about the potential impact of CBAM on carbon emission reductions both in the EU and in other jurisdictions. Would CBAM be effective at reducing emissions and addressing emissions leakage? How would other countries respond to CBAM and would the response affect those countries’ carbon emissions reduction efforts?

Keywords

Regulation; Carbon Emissions; Trade; Sustainability; Decarbonization; Performance; Climate Change; Analysis; Strategy; Taxation; Policy; European Union

Citation

Serafeim, George, and Benjamin Maletta. "Business Implications from Regulating Carbon Emissions in the EU." Harvard Business School Technical Note 122-106, June 2022.
  • Educators

About The Author

George Serafeim

Accounting and Management
→More Publications

More from the Authors

    • 2022
    • Faculty Research

    A Conceptualization of Sub-Living Wages: Liabilities, Leverage, and Risk

    By: Drew Keller, Katie Panella and George Serafeim
    • March 2022
    • Faculty Research

    Sustainable Product Management at Solvay

    By: George Serafeim
    • 2022
    • Financial Analysts Journal

    Which Corporate ESG News Does the Market React To?

    By: George Serafeim and Aaron Yoon
More from the Authors
  • A Conceptualization of Sub-Living Wages: Liabilities, Leverage, and Risk By: Drew Keller, Katie Panella and George Serafeim
  • Sustainable Product Management at Solvay By: George Serafeim
  • Which Corporate ESG News Does the Market React To? By: George Serafeim and Aaron Yoon
ǁ
Campus Map
Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
→Map & Directions
→More Contact Information
  • Make a Gift
  • Site Map
  • Jobs
  • Harvard University
  • Trademarks
  • Policies
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College