Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Faculty & Research
  • Faculty
  • Research
  • Featured Topics
  • Academic Units
  • …→
  • Harvard Business School→
  • Faculty & Research→
Publications
Publications
  • Article
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Measuring the Scientific Effectiveness of Contact Tracing: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

By: Thiemo Fetzer and Thomas Graeber
  • Format:Print
ShareBar

Abstract

Contact tracing has for decades been a cornerstone of the public health approach to epidemics, including Ebola, severe acute respiratory syndrome, and now COVID-19. It has not yet been possible, however, to causally assess the method’s effectiveness using a randomized controlled trial of the sort familiar throughout other areas of science. This study provides evidence that comes close to that ideal. It exploits a large-scale natural experiment that occurred by accident in England in late September 2020. Because of a coding error involving spreadsheet data used by the health authorities, a total of 15,841 COVID-19 cases (around 20% of all cases) failed to have timely contact tracing. By chance, some areas of England were much more severely affected than others. This study finds that the random breakdown of contact tracing led to more illness and death. Conservative causal estimates imply that, relative to cases that were initially missed by the contact tracing system, cases subject to proper contact tracing were associated with a reduction in subsequent new infections of 63% and a reduction in subsequent COVID-19–related deaths of 66% across the 6 wk following the data glitch.

Keywords

COVID-19; Contact Tracing; Public Health; Infectious Diseases; Health Pandemics

Citation

Fetzer, Thiemo, and Thomas Graeber. "Measuring the Scientific Effectiveness of Contact Tracing: Evidence from a Natural Experiment." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no. 33 (August 17, 2021): 1–4.
  • Read Now

About The Author

Thomas W. Graeber

Negotiation, Organizations & Markets
→More Publications

More from the Authors

    • 2022
    • Faculty Research

    Stories, Statistics and Memory

    By: Thomas Graeber, Christopher Roth and Florian Zimmermann
    • 2022
    • Faculty Research

    Confidence, Self-Selection and Bias in the Aggregate

    By: Benjamin Enke, Thomas Graeber and Ryan Oprea
    • 2023
    • Faculty Research

    Cognitive Uncertainty in Intertemporal Choice

    By: Benjamin Enke and Thomas Graeber
More from the Authors
  • Stories, Statistics and Memory By: Thomas Graeber, Christopher Roth and Florian Zimmermann
  • Confidence, Self-Selection and Bias in the Aggregate By: Benjamin Enke, Thomas Graeber and Ryan Oprea
  • Cognitive Uncertainty in Intertemporal Choice By: Benjamin Enke and Thomas Graeber
ǁ
Campus Map
Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
→Map & Directions
→More Contact Information
  • Make a Gift
  • Site Map
  • Jobs
  • Harvard University
  • Trademarks
  • Policies
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College