Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Faculty & Research
  • Faculty
  • Research
  • Featured Topics
  • Academic Units
  • …→
  • Harvard Business School→
  • Faculty & Research→
Publications
Publications
  • June 2021
  • Article
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science

Cognition and Emotion in Extreme Political Action: Individual Differences and Dynamic Interactions

By: Leor Zmigrod and Amit Goldenberg
  • Format:Print
ShareBar

Abstract

Who is most likely to join and engage in extreme political action? While traditional theories have focused on situational factors or group identity attributes, an emerging science illustrates that tendencies for extreme political action may also be rooted in individuals’ idiosyncratic cognitive and affective dispositions. This paper synthesizes cutting-edge evidence demonstrating that an individual’s cognitive and affective architecture shape their willingness to support ideological violence. From a cognitive perspective, traits such as cognitive rigidity, slower perceptual strategies, and poorer executive functions are linked to heightened endorsement for ideological violence. From an emotional standpoint, characteristics associated with emotional reactivity and impaired emotional regulation, such as sensation-seeking and impulsivity, can facilitate readiness for extreme political action. The review hones in on the roles of cognitive rigidity and sensation-seeking as traits heightening proclivities for extreme pro-group behavior, and recommends that future research should aim to assess cognition-emotion interactions to reveal different sub-profiles of political actors. A theoretical framework focused on cognitive and affective information-processing traits—and their interactions—opens up tractable empirical questions and a future research agenda. Identifying subsets of ideologues is an endeavor with potential to inform the design of evidence-based interventions aimed at reducing ideological extremism and fostering social understanding.

Keywords

Extreme Political Action; Ideology; Political Psychology; Cognition-emotion Interactions; Cognition and Thinking; Emotions; Personal Characteristics

Citation

Zmigrod, Leor, and Amit Goldenberg. "Cognition and Emotion in Extreme Political Action: Individual Differences and Dynamic Interactions." Current Directions in Psychological Science 30, no. 3 (June 2021): 218–227.
  • Find it at Harvard
  • Read Now

About The Author

Amit Goldenberg

Negotiation, Organizations & Markets
→More Publications

More from the Authors

    • July 2023
    • PNAS Nexus

    Negative Expressions Are Shared More on Twitter for Public Figures Than for Ordinary Users

    By: Jonas P. Schöne, David Garcia, Brian Parkinson and Amit Goldenberg
    • June 2023
    • Nature Human Behaviour

    Amplification of Emotion on Social Media

    By: Amit Goldenberg and Robb Willer
    • April 19, 2023
    • Scientific American (website)

    Extreme Views Are More Attractive Than Moderate Ones

    By: Amit Goldenberg
More from the Authors
  • Negative Expressions Are Shared More on Twitter for Public Figures Than for Ordinary Users By: Jonas P. Schöne, David Garcia, Brian Parkinson and Amit Goldenberg
  • Amplification of Emotion on Social Media By: Amit Goldenberg and Robb Willer
  • Extreme Views Are More Attractive Than Moderate Ones By: Amit Goldenberg
ǁ
Campus Map
Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
→Map & Directions
→More Contact Information
  • Make a Gift
  • Site Map
  • Jobs
  • Harvard University
  • Trademarks
  • Policies
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College