Malcolm Turner at Vanderbilt

David G. Fubini; Amy  Klopfenstein; James  Barnett

Teaching Plan | HBS Case Collection | April 2020

Malcolm Turner at Vanderbilt

by David G. Fubini, Amy Klopfenstein and James Barnett

Abstract

This teaching plan serves as a supplement to the case “Malcolm Turner at Vanderbilt,” HBS 420-024. The case examines the early decisions of Vanderbilt University’s new athletic director, Malcolm Turner. A newcomer to college athletics, Turner made a series of large-scale decisions shortly after he stepped into the role, such as firing men’s basketball coach Bryce Drew and investing in facilities upgrades. Meanwhile, Vanderbilt’s chancellor resigned several months into Turner’s tenure. At the conclusion of the case, Turner must decide whether to push forward with his plans for Vanderbilt athletics, or wait until the new chancellor is hired. Specifically, he must decide whether to make changes to the university’s struggling football season, including whether to retain football coach Derek Mason. The teaching plan includes a sample discussion plan, suggested assignment questions, and a sample board plan. It also provides information about Turner’s resignation from Vanderbilt, which took place approximately six months after the conclusion of the case.

Keywords: Organizations; Organizational Change and Adaptation; Organizational Culture; Sports; Planning; Strategic Planning; Education; Higher Education; Leadership; Leadership Style; Leading Change; Education Industry; Sports Industry; Tennessee;

Language: English

Format: Print

12 pages

Purchase

Citation:

Fubini, David G., Amy Klopfenstein, and James Barnett. "Malcolm Turner at Vanderbilt." Harvard Business School Teaching Plan 420-081, April 2020.

Zameer Kassam Fine Jewelry (ZKFJ) designs custom engagement rings that tell the story of a couple’s relationship. The case describes the company’s process for engaging clients, which has historically been a relatively offline, high-touch experience. Obliged by social-distancing guidelines with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, Zameer Kassam and his team had been forced to take many facets of the business online. Although clients still seemed delighted by their rings, Kassam wondered what might be being lost for his clients and employees in this new virtual medium. On the other hand, perhaps there were aspects of the process that could be improved through online delivery? Such a transition could represent an opportunity to grow the business.

This case explores a new board director who asks a detailed question about a footnote in the lengthy board packet distributed to directors by management. The case allows for discussion about the amount of information and level of detail provided by management, the level of preparation directors engage in prior to board meetings, and the appropriate strategic focus of the board. This case is part of a series of vignettes that capture different dilemmas faced by directors as they join boards of companies and understand the dynamics of the new boards that they join.

This case explores a new board director who wants more detail from the management team than his fellow directors are willing to press for. New board director Sam Pesca is frustrated that CFO Alex Marotta provides only a minimal two-page financial summary at board meetings, despite Pesca’s requests for more comprehensive information. The other directors object to pressing Marotta for more detail, and young CEO R.J. Oscott asks Pesca to refrain from pressing the CFO. This case is part of a series of vignettes that capture different dilemmas faced by directors as they join boards of companies and understand the dynamics of the new boards that they join.

Faculty & Research

Malcolm Turner at Vanderbilt

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author