Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Faculty & Research
  • Faculty
  • Research
  • Featured Topics
  • Academic Units
  • …→
  • Harvard Business School→
  • Faculty & Research→
Publications
Publications
  • 2020
  • Working Paper

Sticky Capital Controls

By: Miguel Acosta-Henao, Laura Alfaro and Andres Fernandez
  • Format:Print
  • | Language:English
ShareBar

Abstract

There is much ongoing debate on the merits of capital controls as effective policy instruments. The differing perspectives are due in part to a lack of empirical studies that look at the intensive margin of controls, which in turn has prevented a quantitative assessment of optimal capital control models against the data. We contribute to this debate by addressing both positive and normative features of capital controls. On the positive side, we build a new dataset using textual analysis, from which we document a set of stylized facts of capital controls along their intensive and extensive margins for 21 emerging markets. We document that capital controls are “sticky”; that is, changes to capital controls do not occur frequently, and when they do, they remain in place for a long time. Overall, they have not been used systematically across countries or time, and there has been considerable heterogeneity across countries in terms of the intensity with which they have been used. On the normative side, we extend a model of capital controls relying on pecuniary externalities augmented by including an (S, s) cost of implementing such policies. We illustrate how this friction goes a long way toward bringing the model closer to the data. When the extended model is calibrated for each of the countries in the new dataset, we find that the size of these costs is large, thus substantially reducing the welfare-enhancing effects of capital controls compared with the frictionless Ramsey benchmark. We conclude with a discussion of the structural interpretations of such costs, which calls for a richer set of policy constraints when considering the use of capital controls in models of pecuniary externalities.

Keywords

Capital Controls; Macroprudential Policies; Stickiness; Intensive; (s, S) Costs; Capital; Management; Macroeconomics

Citation

Acosta-Henao, Miguel, Laura Alfaro, and Andres Fernandez. "Sticky Capital Controls." NBER Working Paper Series, No. 26997, April 2020.
  • Read Now

About The Author

Laura Alfaro

General Management
→More Publications

More from the Authors

    • March 2021
    • Journal of Financial Economics

    On the Direct and Indirect Real Effects of Credit Supply Shocks

    By: Laura Alfaro, Manuel García-Santana and Enrique Moral-Benito
    • December 2020
    • Faculty Research

    Latam Airlines and COVID-19: Seeking Bankruptcy Protection in the United States

    By: Laura Alfaro
    • 2020
    • Faculty Research

    Reserve Accumulation, Sovereign Debt, and Exchange Rate Policy

    By: Laura Alfaro and Fabio Kanczuk
More from the Authors
  • On the Direct and Indirect Real Effects of Credit Supply Shocks By: Laura Alfaro, Manuel García-Santana and Enrique Moral-Benito
  • Latam Airlines and COVID-19: Seeking Bankruptcy Protection in the United States By: Laura Alfaro
  • Reserve Accumulation, Sovereign Debt, and Exchange Rate Policy By: Laura Alfaro and Fabio Kanczuk
ǁ
Campus Map
Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
→Map & Directions
→More Contact Information
  • Make a Gift
  • Site Map
  • Jobs
  • Harvard University
  • Trademarks
  • Policies
  • Digital Accessibility
Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College