Getting Your Team to Do More Than Meet Deadlines

Charlotte  Blank; Laura M. Giurge; Laurel  Newman; A.V.  Whillans

Editorial | Harvard Business Review (website) | November 15, 2019

Getting Your Team to Do More Than Meet Deadlines

by Charlotte Blank, Laura M. Giurge, Laurel Newman and A.V. Whillans

Abstract

When it comes to our to-do lists, many of us prioritize checking off tasks that are easiest to complete or are due first, regardless of importance—a phenomenon that scholars describe as the “mere urgency” effect. This tendency becomes stronger the busier we are. But constantly prioritizing urgent tasks means that important tasks that have no urgent deadline (such as updating your resume or doing creative work) get pushed aside for later and later. Some just never get done. When we fail to do what’s important, often what matters most to us, we feel stressed, overwhelmed, and unmotivated—and firms are less productive. Research suggests managers can help employees combat the tendency to put off for tomorrow what isn’t due today: have employees set aside proactive time for work that is important but not urgent.

Keywords: Employees; Time Management; Performance Improvement;

Format: Electronic

Find at Harvard Register to Read

Citation:

Blank, Charlotte, Laura M. Giurge, Laurel Newman, and A.V. Whillans. "Getting Your Team to Do More Than Meet Deadlines." Harvard Business Review (website) (November 15, 2019). (Shared Authorship.)

Dramatic reductions in carbon emissions must take place immediately. A human-centric method of reducing environmental impacts is to “nudge” individuals away from single-occupancy vehicle (SOVs) commutes toward more sustainable ones. While an abundance of research has focused on external determinants of mode choice, we know much less about the behavioral determinants. The field of behavioral science is therefore overdue for a focus on transportation. First, we describe the founding of our multidisciplinary research team. Next, we describe barriers to behavior change and outline lessons learned. Lastly, we describe how COVID-19 has shaped this research. This paper is meant to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policy makers in order to develop a behaviorally-informed framework that can be leveraged by policymakers, government, and organizations worldwide.

Spending money on time-saving services can improve happiness and reduce stress. Yet many people do not spend money to save time even when they can afford to do so, potentially because they feel guilty about paying other people to complete disliked tasks on their behalf. Consistent with this proposition, we find evidence that individuals are most likely to experience guilt when outsourcing to a salient service provider. Across two large-scale surveys of working adults, including a nationally representative sample of employed Americans (Study 1a & 1b, N = 1,140), individuals reported greater guilt when they thought about outsourcing to a salient (vs. non-salient) service provider. Using a novel lab paradigm, participants felt greater guilt when the service provider was salient, which in turn undermined their willingness to buy time (Study 2, N = 350). In Study 3, these effects were mitigated by emphasizing the benefits of task completion for the service provider (N = 390). This research points to the potential of simple interventions to help organizations encourage individuals to make time-saving purchases.

With the pandemic forcing millions of Americans into financial distress, it is only natural to want to lend friends and family a hand. But giving them a gift to help them out can do a lot of harm—unless you do it the right way.

Faculty & Research

Getting Your Team to Do More Than Meet Deadlines

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author