Breaking Even: Political Economy and Private Enterprise in the Norwegian Glass Industry, 1739-1803

Rolv Petter Amdam; Robert  Fredona; Sophus A. Reinert

Article | Business History Review | Summer 2019

Breaking Even: Political Economy and Private Enterprise in the Norwegian Glass Industry, 1739-1803

by Rolv Petter Amdam, Robert Fredona and Sophus A. Reinert

Abstract

Using internal debates and surviving account books, this article traces the 18th-century history of the Norwegian glass industry, created to exploit Norway's immense natural resource wealth, and of the chartered company that would later become Norway's iconic Christiania Glasmagasin. The investors in the company, many of them among Norway's “founding fathers,” were individually responsible for its losses and it operated, remarkably, at an annual loss for nearly five decades. The article asks why, beyond the anticipation of a royal import ban on foreign glass, private investors might have continued to accept such losses. It focuses on tensions between cameralist and liberal ideologies in the creation of an important national industry and on older (and perhaps more sustainable) ways of thinking about profitability.

Keywords: glass industry; natural resources; profitability; political economy; cameralism; liberalization; patriotism; Profit; Natural Environment; Business History; Norway;

Format: Print

Find at Harvard

Citation:

Amdam, Rolv Petter, Robert Fredona, and Sophus A. Reinert. "Breaking Even: Political Economy and Private Enterprise in the Norwegian Glass Industry, 1739-1803." Business History Review 93, no. 2 (Summer 2019): 275–317.

The continent of Europe seemed in the spring of 2015 to be in a weaker position relative to other world regions than it had in centuries. Though comparatively small, it had long played a disproportionate role in world history, to the extent that the modern world system of states itself in large parts had been created in the wake of European imperialism. This case examines the deep history of Europe’s so-called “Great Divergence,” the means by which it achieved “modern economic growth” and conquered large parts of the known world, and the consequences of this moment for the past, present, and future of capitalism.

In the fall of 2018, Serbia found itself at a crossroads yet again. Following the Balkan Wars of the 1990s and the collapse of Yugoslavia, the country had embarked on a slow and arduous process of accession to the European Union (EU). This had been further hampered by the country’s tortuous relations to its breakaway province of Kosovo, one of several regions fighting for political independence at a time when the continent itself was seeking greater economic and political integration in the form of the EU. Support for the EU accession was falling in Serbia, however, also in light of the increasing presence in the country of Russian and Chinese interests and investments. But would the country eventually have to pick a side amidst the rapidly changing geopolitics of the early twenty-first century?

Faculty & Research

Breaking Even: Political Economy and Private Enterprise in the Norwegian Glass Industry, 1739-1803

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author