More from the Author

• Other Unpublished Work | 2019

  Stereotypes and Politics

  Pedro Bordalo, Marco Tabellini and David Yang

  Citation:

  Bordalo, Pedro, Marco Tabellini, and David Yang. "Stereotypes and Politics." 2019.  View Details

  CiteView Details

  Related

• Other Unpublished Work | 2019

  Changing In-group Boundaries: The Role of New Immigrant Waves in the U.S.

  Vasiliki Fouka, Shom Mazumder and Marco Tabellini

  How are boundaries of in-groups and out-groups in a society formed, and how do they evolve? Does the appearance of a new out-group foster or hinder the incorporation of previously excluded groups? We address these issues in the context of immigration to the US between 1965 and 2010, and study how new immigrants from China and Mexico affected native whites’ attitudes towards blacks and their social integration. Using an instrumental variables strategy that leverages exogenous variation in the arrival of immigrants to different states combined with survey and census data, we find that immigration reduces whites’ prejudice toward African Americans, and raises black-white intermarriage rates. These effects are driven by Mexican – but not by Chinese – immigrants, consistent with a mechanism in which the arrival of a more socially distant group narrows the distance between the majority and existing minorities. Our study provides an under-appreciated glimpse into the evolution of social status in multi-ethnic societies.

  Keywords: Immigration; Attitudes; Boundaries; Prejudice and Bias;

  Citation:

  Fouka, Vasiliki, Shom Mazumder, and Marco Tabellini. "Changing In-group Boundaries: The Role of New Immigrant Waves in the U.S." 2019.  View Details

  CiteView Details

  Related

• Working Paper | HBS Working Paper Series | 2019

  Legislators' Response to Changes in the Electorate: The Great Migration and Civil Rights

  Alvaro Calderon, Vasiliki Fouka and Marco Tabellini

  Between 1940 and 1970, during the second Great Migration, more than 4million African Americans moved from the South to the North of the United States. In this period, blacks were often excluded from the political process in the South, but were eligible to vote in the North. We study if, by changing the composition and the preferences of the northern electorate, the Great Migration increased demand for racial equality and induced legislators to more actively promote civil rights legislation. We predict black inflows by interacting historical settlements of southern born blacks across northern counties with the differential rate of black emigration from different southern states after 1940. We find that black in-migration increased the Democratic vote share and encouraged grass-roots activism. In turn, Congress members representing areas more exposed to black inflows became increasingly supportive of civil rights. They were not only more likely to vote in favor of pro-civil rights bills, but also more willing to take direct actions, such as signing discharge petitions, to promote racial equality. Investigating the mechanisms, we document that both “between” and “within” party changes contributed to the shift in the position of northern legislators on civil rights. Taken together, our findings suggest that the Great Migration played an important role in the development and success of the civil rights movement.

  Citation:

  Calderon, Alvaro, Vasiliki Fouka, and Marco Tabellini. "Legislators' Response to Changes in the Electorate: The Great Migration and Civil Rights." Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 20-017, August 2019.  View Details

  CiteView Details Read Now

  Related