Miroglio Fashion (A)

Sunil  Gupta; David  Lane

Case | HBS Case Collection | February 2019

Miroglio Fashion (A)

by Sunil Gupta and David Lane

Abstract

Francesco Cavarero, chief information officer of Miroglio Fashion, Italy’s third-largest retailer of women’s apparel, was trying to bring analytical rigor to the company’s forecasting and inventory management decisions. But fashion is inherently hard to predict. Can artificial intelligence and machine learning replace human intuition in this industry?

Keywords: Inventory management; demand forecasting; artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Forecasting and Prediction; Operations; Management; Decision Making; Apparel and Accessories Industry; Fashion Industry;

Language: English

Format: Print

8 pages

Educators Purchase

Citation:

Gupta, Sunil, and David Lane. "Miroglio Fashion (A)." Harvard Business School Case 519-053, February 2019.

Aperture Investors is a startup investment firm that seeks to disrupt the asset management industry through competitive differentiation by charging investors primarily when its portfolio managers outperform the marketplace. Headed by Wall Street veteran Peter Kraus and backed with substantial and patient seed capital, Aperture seeks to attract both star portfolio managers and assets from mutual funds and hedge funds. Kraus believes that his innovative business model addresses the current dysfunctional fee and incentive structures in the industry, which have led to long-term market underperformance, and that Aperture will address the reasons that are motivating investors to shift to cheaper, passively-managed index and exchange-traded funds.

By 2018, Amazon had become one of the world’s largest e-commerce players with over $233 billion in annual sales. Although its profitability had been uneven even after 23 years of its inception, its stock price had risen almost 130,000% since the company went public. During this time Amazon has spread its business across a variety of products and services that some saw as unrelated. Was Amazon spreading itself too thin or were its investments positioning the company for the future?

In summer 2016, four of Australia’s top five banks petitioned regulators for permission to bargain collectively with Apple over the terms under which they would support its digital wallet, Apple Pay. They argued that doing so would force concessions from Apple that would improve market competitiveness, consumer choice, price transparency, and transaction security for all mobile payments in Australia. The banks stood to benefit as well. If they succeeded in their primary aim of opening the contactless payment functionality of Apple’s devices to their own digital wallets—something Apple had thus far refused in any market it had entered—the banks could retain customer relationships that Apple Pay threatened to usurp and limit Apple’s free-riding on the contactless payment infrastructure the banks had just spent several years building.

Faculty & Research

Miroglio Fashion (A)

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author

Faculty & Research

Miroglio Fashion (A)

Abstract

Citation:

Related Work

About the Author

More from the Author