Common Variants of the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Do Not Predict the Positive Mood Benefits of Prosocial Spending

Ashley V. Whillans; Lara B. Aknin; Colin  Ross; Lihan  Chen; Frances S. Chen

Article | Emotion

Common Variants of the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Do Not Predict the Positive Mood Benefits of Prosocial Spending

by Ashley V. Whillans, Lara B. Aknin, Colin Ross, Lihan Chen and Frances S. Chen

Abstract

Who benefits most from helping others? Previous research suggests that common polymorphisms of the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) predict whether people behave generously and experience increases in positive mood in response to socially-focused experiences in daily life. Building on these findings, we conducted an experiment with a large, ethnically homogenous sample (N=437) to examine whether individual differences in three frequently studied single nucleotide polymorphisms of OXTR (rs53576, rs2268498, rs2254298) also predict differences in the positive mood benefits of financial generosity. Consistent with past research, participants who were randomly assigned to purchase items for others (vs. themselves) reported greater positive affect. Contrary to predictions, using Bayesian statistics, we found conclusive evidence that the benefits of generosity were not moderated by individual differences in OXTR SNPs. The current work highlights the importance of publishing null results to build cumulative knowledge linking neurobiological factors to positive emotional experiences.

Keywords: prosocial behavior; positivity; behavior genetics; individual differences; Behavior; Emotions; Genetics; Spending;

Format: Print

Find at Harvard Read Now

Citation:

Whillans, Ashley V., Lara B. Aknin, Colin Ross, Lihan Chen, and Frances S. Chen. "Common Variants of the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Do Not Predict the Positive Mood Benefits of Prosocial Spending." Emotion 20, no. 5 (August 2020): 734–749.

As Covid turns even the most benign of social activities into risky propositions, many of us find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of rejecting our friends’ and family’s invitations to non-socially-distant activities. It can be particularly challenging to explain our Covid-related concerns when saying no to these events, as we may worry about coming across judgmental or condescending. But new research shows that voicing these concerns can actually improve your relationship with the person inviting you. In addition, by focusing on welfare concerns (health and safety), as opposed to social concerns (fear of offending a friend), we can feel more comfortable turning down invitations — and explaining the reasons why.

Article | American Journal of Preventive Medicine | August 2020

Volunteering and Subsequent Health and Well-Being in Older Adults: An Outcome-Wide Longitudinal Approach

Eric Kim, A.V. Whillans, Matt Lee, Ying Chen and Tyler VanderWeele

Background: Growing evidence documents strong associations between volunteering and favorable health and well-being outcomes. However, epidemiological studies have not evaluated whether changes in volunteering are associated with subsequent health and well-being outcomes.
Methods: Data were from 12,998 participants in the Health and Retirement Study—a large, diverse, prospective, and nationally representative cohort of U.S. adults age >50. Using multiple logistic-, linear-, and generalized linear regression models, we evaluated if changes in volunteering (between t0;2006/2008 and t1;2010/2012) were associated with 35 indicators of physical health, health behaviors, and psychosocial well-being (in t2;2014/2016). Models adjusted for sociodemographics, physical health, health behaviors, psychosocial factors, personality, as well as volunteering and all outcomes in the pre-baseline wave (t0;2006/2008). Results accounted for multiple testing and data were analyzed in 2019.
Results: Over the 4-year follow-up period, participants who volunteered ≥100 hours/year (versus 0 hours/year) had reduced risk of mortality and physical functioning limitations, higher physical activity, and better psychosocial outcomes (higher: positive affect, optimism, purpose in life and lower: depressive symptoms, hopelessness, loneliness, infrequent contact with friends). Importantly, volunteering was not associated with other physical health outcomes (diabetes, hypertension, stroke, cancer, heart disease, lung disease, arthritis, overweight/obesity, cognitive impairment, chronic pain), health behaviors (binge drinking, smoking, sleep problems), and psychosocial outcomes (life satisfaction, mastery, depression, negative affect, perceived constraints, living with spouse, contact with other family/children).
Conclusions: With further research, volunteering is an activity that physicians might suggest to their willing and able patients as a way of simultaneously enhancing health and society.

Keywords: volunteering; prosocial behavior; well-being; health; Behavior; Health; Welfare or Wellbeing;

Citation:

Kim, Eric, A.V. Whillans, Matt Lee, Ying Chen, and Tyler VanderWeele. "Volunteering and Subsequent Health and Well-Being in Older Adults: An Outcome-Wide Longitudinal Approach." American Journal of Preventive Medicine 59, no. 2 (August 2020): 176–186. View Details

Cite View Details Find at Harvard

Faculty & Research

Common Variants of the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Do Not Predict the Positive Mood Benefits of Prosocial Spending

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author