Financing the Response to Climate Change: The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds

Malcolm  Baker; Daniel  Bergstresser; George  Serafeim; Jeffrey  Wurgler

Working Paper | 2018

Financing the Response to Climate Change: The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds

by Malcolm Baker, Daniel Bergstresser, George Serafeim and Jeffrey Wurgler

Abstract

We study green bonds, which are bonds whose proceeds are used for environmentally sensitive purposes. After an overview of the U.S. corporate and municipal green bonds markets, we study pricing and ownership patterns using a simple framework that incorporates assets with nonpecuniary utility. As predicted, we find that green municipal bonds are issued at a premium to otherwise similar ordinary bonds. We also confirm that green bonds, particularly small or essentially riskless ones, are more closely held than ordinary bonds. These pricing and ownership effects are strongest for bonds that are externally certified as green.

Keywords: green bonds; pricing; climate change; Bonds; Environmental Sustainability; Financial Markets; Price; Ownership;

Language: English

Format: Print

Read Now

Citation:

Baker, Malcolm, Daniel Bergstresser, George Serafeim, and Jeffrey Wurgler. "Financing the Response to Climate Change: The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds." NBER Working Paper Series, No. 25194, October 2018.

The case describes the challenges that UBS faced as a result of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation for tax fraud, that claimed that UBS had helped some 52,000 U.S. residents hide billions of dollars in untaxed assets in secret Swiss accounts between 2000 and 2007, depriving the U.S. Treasury of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes. Why did this happen inside UBS? What were the incentives and the corporate governance failures that led to these events? How should the board of directors of UBS respond to the requests of the tax and regulatory authorities?

As sustainability issues, also labelled environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues, become financially material, companies, investors, and regulators are designing strategies and policies to improve sustainability disclosure and performance. In this paper, we outline a framework of how sustainability issues become financially material arguing that materiality is not a “state of being” but a “process of becoming.” Our framework could assist companies and investors to make resource allocation decisions based on expectations about future materiality, social entrepreneurs and NGOs to develop their theories of social change, and policy makers to design disclosure regulations. Moreover, our framework generates predictions about the conditions under which sustainability issues become financial material that could be empirically tested in the future.

Faculty & Research

Financing the Response to Climate Change: The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds

Abstract

Citation:

About the Authors

More from these Authors