Financing the Response to Climate Change: The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds

Malcolm  Baker; Daniel  Bergstresser; George  Serafeim; Jeffrey  Wurgler

Working Paper | 2018

Financing the Response to Climate Change: The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds

by Malcolm Baker, Daniel Bergstresser, George Serafeim and Jeffrey Wurgler

Abstract

We study green bonds, which are bonds whose proceeds are used for environmentally sensitive purposes. After an overview of the U.S. corporate and municipal green bonds markets, we study pricing and ownership patterns using a simple framework that incorporates assets with nonpecuniary utility. As predicted, we find that green municipal bonds are issued at a premium to otherwise similar ordinary bonds. We also confirm that green bonds, particularly small or essentially riskless ones, are more closely held than ordinary bonds. These pricing and ownership effects are strongest for bonds that are externally certified as green.

Keywords: green bonds; pricing; climate change; Bonds; Environmental Sustainability; Financial Markets; Price; Ownership;

Language: English

Format: Print

Read Now

Citation:

Baker, Malcolm, Daniel Bergstresser, George Serafeim, and Jeffrey Wurgler. "Financing the Response to Climate Change: The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds." NBER Working Paper Series, No. 25194, October 2018.

Organizations create significant positive and negative impacts through their employment practices. This paper builds on the substantial body of research regarding job quality and impact measurement to present a framework for monetized analysis of employment impact. We identify and propose a framework for measuring the four most salient dimensions of impact for employees, including wage quality, career advancement, opportunity, and health and wellbeing, as well as two principle impacts, diversity and employment location, for the broader labor community. The framework and methodology for calculating employment impact-weighted accounting figures is applied to several large corporations, resulting in positive impacts that range between 25 and 249% of their EBITDA suggesting significant heterogeneity in employment practices across organizations. These results demonstrate the feasibility of calculating employment impact in monetary terms, and provide a foundation for future application across additional geographies and contexts.

We apply the product impact measurement framework of the Impact-Weighted Accounts Initiative (IWAI) in two competitor companies within the consumer-packaged goods industry. We design a methodology that allows us to calculate monetary impact estimates on customer health, access and affordability of products and recyclability, among other factors. Our results indicate substantial differences in the impact that competitors have through their products. These differences demonstrate how impact measures reflect business strategy choices and informs decision-making on industry-specific areas, including food reformulation and product placement.

Faculty & Research

Financing the Response to Climate Change: The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds

Abstract

Citation:

About the Authors

More from these Authors