The Foundation For Global Employee Engagement

Charlotte  Blank; Russ  Frey; Allan  Schweyer; A.V.  Whillans; Chris  Winkelspecht

White Paper | 2017

The Foundation For Global Employee Engagement: A Behavior-Based Model for Leaders & Practitioners

by Charlotte Blank, Russ Frey, Allan Schweyer, A.V. Whillans and Chris Winkelspecht

Abstract

Fully engaging employees has never been more important—or less understood. Despite years of effort and substantial investments, few organizations have made real progress in achieving true engagement within the ranks of their workforce.

As the prelude to a series of design guides for leaders and HR practitioners, this paper introduces a holistic model of engagement that is underpinned by insights gleaned from the behavioral sciences. We believe the foundational “human” dimensions of engagement described in this model—and the evidence-based principles and practices associated with each—provides a roadmap for organizations that wish to emulate the success of the high-performing organizations that have managed to create a culture of employee engagement.

Keywords: employee engagement; behavioral science; Performance; Employees; Attitudes; Performance; Organizational Culture;

Language: English

Format: Electronic

Read Now

Citation:

Blank, Charlotte, Russ Frey, Allan Schweyer, A.V. Whillans, and Chris Winkelspecht. "The Foundation For Global Employee Engagement: A Behavior-Based Model for Leaders & Practitioners." White Paper, Maritz Motivation Solutions, 2017.

Conventional wisdom says you should ask your colleagues for feedback. However, research suggests that feedback often has no (or even a negative) impact on our performance. This is because the feedback we receive is often too vague—it fails to highlight what we can improve on or how to improve. New research suggests a better approach. Across four experiments—including a field experiment conducted in an executive education classroom—researchers found that people received more effective input when they asked for advice rather than feedback.

When making major life decisions—such as choosing what to do after graduation—is it better to prioritize time or money? In a pre-registered longitudinal study of 1,232 graduating university students, respondents who valued time over money chose more intrinsically rewarding activities and were happier one year after graduation. These results remained significant controlling for baseline happiness, potential confounds such as materialism and socioeconomic status, and when using alternative model specifications. These findings extend prior research by showing that the tendency to value time over money is not only predictive of daily consumer choices but also of major life decisions. Additionally, this research clarifies the direction of the observed associations between valuing time and money and happiness, showing that valuing time over money uniquely contributes to well-being, in part by encouraging intrinsic motivation. Together, this work sheds new light on whether, when, and how valuing time shapes happiness.

When looking to improve workplace performance, people often seek third-party input by asking for feedback. However, we propose that asking for feedback might not be the most effective way of soliciting critical and actionable input. We offer a simple yet powerful alternative: ask for advice instead. Across four experiments (N=1,438), including a field experiment, we show that people offer more critical and actionable input when they are asked to provide advice (versus feedback)—even when they are asked to provide comments on identical output. When asked to provide feedback (versus advice), givers focus too much on evaluating the recipient, which undermines their ability to generate constructive (i.e. critical and actionable) input. Our findings suggest that framing feedback provision as advice provision may be a promising way of soliciting constructive third-party input.

Faculty & Research

The Foundation For Global Employee Engagement: A Behavior-Based Model for Leaders & Practitioners

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author