The Foundation For Global Employee Engagement

Charlotte  Blank; Russ  Frey; Allan  Schweyer; A.V.  Whillans; Chris  Winkelspecht

White Paper | 2017

The Foundation For Global Employee Engagement: A Behavior-Based Model for Leaders & Practitioners

by Charlotte Blank, Russ Frey, Allan Schweyer, A.V. Whillans and Chris Winkelspecht

Abstract

Fully engaging employees has never been more important—or less understood. Despite years of effort and substantial investments, few organizations have made real progress in achieving true engagement within the ranks of their workforce.

As the prelude to a series of design guides for leaders and HR practitioners, this paper introduces a holistic model of engagement that is underpinned by insights gleaned from the behavioral sciences. We believe the foundational “human” dimensions of engagement described in this model—and the evidence-based principles and practices associated with each—provides a roadmap for organizations that wish to emulate the success of the high-performing organizations that have managed to create a culture of employee engagement.

Keywords: employee engagement; behavioral science; Performance; Employees; Attitudes; Performance; Organizational Culture;

Language: English

Format: Electronic

Read Now

Citation:

Blank, Charlotte, Russ Frey, Allan Schweyer, A.V. Whillans, and Chris Winkelspecht. "The Foundation For Global Employee Engagement: A Behavior-Based Model for Leaders & Practitioners." White Paper, Maritz Motivation Solutions, 2017.

Consumers feel increasingly pressed for time and money. Gifts have the potential to reduce scarcity in recipients’ lives, yet little is known about how recipients perceive gifts given with the intention of saving them time or money. Across 4 studies (N=1,403), we demonstrate that the recipients of gifts intending to save money experience more negative self-conscious emotions and infer lower status position than recipients of gifts intending to save time. Recipients who report experiencing greater financial scarcity in their daily lives (who may benefit most from gifts intending to save them money), experience negative emotions to a greater extent and perceive an even lower status position than recipients who experience relatively little money scarcity. These findings are the first to directly evaluate the implications of receiving gifts seeking to address time and money scarcity and suggest that recipients may benefit more from gifts given with the intention to save time.

Car commuters report higher levels of stress and lower job satisfaction compared to train commuters—in large part because car commuting can involve driving in traffic and navigating tense road situations. Some employers are trying to get involved and reduce car commuting. But how can organizations encourage their employees to commute differently? Researchers tried to answer this question by designing a series of experiments to “nudge” employees to change how they commute. Overall, they found these light-touch interventions failed to shift people’s commuting behavior.

When it comes to our to-do lists, many of us prioritize checking off tasks that are easiest to complete or are due first, regardless of importance—a phenomenon that scholars describe as the “mere urgency” effect. This tendency becomes stronger the busier we are. But constantly prioritizing urgent tasks means that important tasks that have no urgent deadline (such as updating your resume or doing creative work) get pushed aside for later and later. Some just never get done. When we fail to do what’s important, often what matters most to us, we feel stressed, overwhelmed, and unmotivated—and firms are less productive. Research suggests managers can help employees combat the tendency to put off for tomorrow what isn’t due today: have employees set aside proactive time for work that is important but not urgent.

Faculty & Research

The Foundation For Global Employee Engagement: A Behavior-Based Model for Leaders & Practitioners

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author