Who Is More Useful? The Impact of Performance Incentives on Work and Personal Relationships

Alice  Lee-Yoon; Julia  Hur; Ashley V. Whillans

Working Paper | HBS Working Paper Series | 2018

Who Is More Useful? The Impact of Performance Incentives on Work and Personal Relationships

by Alice Lee-Yoon, Julia Hur and Ashley V. Whillans

Abstract

Employees today report being too busy to talk to their friends and family, even though the number of hours they work has remained relatively constant over the last five decades. We highlight incentive systems as one underappreciated factor contributing to this phenomenon and explore the role of incentives in shaping how employees think about their different social relationships. Results from one archival dataset, one panel survey, and two experiments (n = 132,139) show that when employees are paid for performance, they prioritize spending time socializing with work colleagues at the sacrifice of spending time with friends and family. We further document goal instrumentality as a mechanism for these results: employees who receive performance incentives perceive their work ties as highly instrumental in achieving their goals. These findings provide the first empirical evidence that incentives shape employees’ social interactions within and outside of work, potentially providing a novel explanation for the dissolution of familial and personal ties in many developed countries.

Keywords: Performance incentives; work-family boundary management; instrumentality; emotions; lonelines; Employees; Performance; Motivation and Incentives; Work-Life Balance; Emotions;

Language: English

Format: Print

59 pages

Read Now

Citation:

Lee-Yoon, Alice, Julia Hur, and Ashley V. Whillans. "Who Is More Useful? The Impact of Performance Incentives on Work and Personal Relationships." Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 19-050, October 2018. (Revised December 2018, Shared Authorship.)

As Covid turns even the most benign of social activities into risky propositions, many of us find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of rejecting our friends’ and family’s invitations to non-socially-distant activities. It can be particularly challenging to explain our Covid-related concerns when saying no to these events, as we may worry about coming across judgmental or condescending. But new research shows that voicing these concerns can actually improve your relationship with the person inviting you. In addition, by focusing on welfare concerns (health and safety), as opposed to social concerns (fear of offending a friend), we can feel more comfortable turning down invitations — and explaining the reasons why.

Who benefits most from helping others? Previous research suggests that common polymorphisms of the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) predict whether people behave generously and experience increases in positive mood in response to socially-focused experiences in daily life. Building on these findings, we conducted an experiment with a large, ethnically homogenous sample (N=437) to examine whether individual differences in three frequently studied single nucleotide polymorphisms of OXTR (rs53576, rs2268498, rs2254298) also predict differences in the positive mood benefits of financial generosity. Consistent with past research, participants who were randomly assigned to purchase items for others (vs. themselves) reported greater positive affect. Contrary to predictions, using Bayesian statistics, we found conclusive evidence that the benefits of generosity were not moderated by individual differences in OXTR SNPs. The current work highlights the importance of publishing null results to build cumulative knowledge linking neurobiological factors to positive emotional experiences.

Faculty & Research

Who Is More Useful? The Impact of Performance Incentives on Work and Personal Relationships

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author