Citation:
Weiss, Mitch, and Mariana Oseguera Rodriguez. "ofo." Harvard Business School Teaching Note 819-157, June 2019. (Revised December 2019.) View Details|
Case HBS Case Collection October 2018 Shield AI |
Abstract
Shield AI’s quadcopter – with no pilot and no flight plan – could clear a building and outpace human warfighters by almost five minutes. This was not to say that it was better than the warfighters or would replace their jobs, but it was evidence that autonomous robots deployed in this fashion could keep up with the pace of operators, serve as a force multiplier, and help protect civilian and service member lives. But was it evidence that the Shield AI team should ask their newest potential customer for a contract 50-60 times more than their only two contracts to date? Would asking for what a system of coordinated, exploring robots really cost - $50 to $60 million - scare off their U.S. government customer? No one would blink if Lockheed Martin, Boeing, or other large defense companies proposed a $60 million effort to do the same, but would it make Shield AI, barely two years past founding, look arrogant, ignorant, or both?
Keywords: public entrepreneurship; artificial intelligence; AI; entrepreneurial sales; government; defense; Shield AI; Brandon Tseng; Ryan Tseng; Andrew Reiter; robots; robotics; UAV; UAVs; government sales; Entrepreneurship; Public Sector; Sales; Government Administration; National Security; Business and Government Relations; Technology Industry; United States;
Citation:
Weiss, Mitchell, and A.J. Steinlage. "Shield AI." Harvard Business School Case 819-062, October 2018.
