Innovation Should Be a Top Priority for Boards. So Why Isn't It?

J. Yo-Jud  Cheng; Boris  Groysberg

Article | Harvard Business Review (website) | September 21, 2018

Innovation Should Be a Top Priority for Boards. So Why Isn't It?

by J. Yo-Jud Cheng and Boris Groysberg

Abstract

Corporate directors and executives alike recognize that today’s pace of change continues to accelerate and that firms need to innovate to stay ahead. But are boards doing enough to support innovation, as they should? We conducted a survey of over 5,000 board members from around the world to find out. We found that, overall, innovation does not rank as a top strategic challenge for the majority of boards. Although directors in certain industries are more cognizant of the threat of disruption, the widespread lack of board-level engagement in innovation processes could be a major blind spot and a potential liability. Fewer than one-third (30%) of respondents see innovation as one of the top three challenges their company faces in achieving its strategic objectives, and just 21% think that technology trends are a major strategic challenge. Innovation ranks fifth, after more conventional concerns such as attracting and retaining top talent and the regulatory environment. Boards’ abilities to foster innovation clearly fall short when compared with their other activities.

Keywords: corporate governance; board of directors; innovation; technology; Innovation and Invention; Corporate Governance; Governing and Advisory Boards; Business Strategy;

Format: Electronic

Citation:

Cheng, J. Yo-Jud, and Boris Groysberg. "Innovation Should Be a Top Priority for Boards. So Why Isn't It?" Harvard Business Review (website) (September 21, 2018).

Sanctuary Soft CEO Elizabeth Smalley faced increasing pressure from her primary investor to expand operations internationally. If successful, the expansion could enlarge Sanctuary’s customer base and enable the firm to better serve existing clients’ overseas offices. But it was not clear which region had the most favorable labor market and customer opportunity for expansion. Smalley was particularly concerned about finding qualified software programmers abroad. In the past, the California-based firm added staff and expanded its clientele by poaching talent and customers from rivals. This strategy was effective in California, but other regions had more stringent regulations. Given the legal challenges, would poaching work abroad? Where should Sanctuary expand, and how?

Faculty & Research

Innovation Should Be a Top Priority for Boards. So Why Isn't It?

Abstract

Citation:

About the Authors

More from these Authors