Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Faculty & Research
  • Faculty
  • Research
  • Featured Topics
  • Academic Units
  • …→
  • Harvard Business School→
  • Faculty & Research→
Publications
Publications
  • Article
  • Texas National Security Review

Beacon and Warning: Sherman Kent, Scientific Hubris, and the CIA's Office of National Estimates

By: J. Peter Scoblic
  • Format:Print
ShareBar

Abstract

Would-be forecasters have increasingly extolled the predictive potential of Big Data and artificial intelligence. This essay reviews the career of Sherman Kent, the Yale historian who directed the CIA’s Office of National Estimates from 1952 to 1967, with an eye toward evaluating this enthusiasm. Charged with anticipating threats to U.S. national security, Kent believed, as did much of the postwar academy, that contemporary developments in the social sciences enabled scholars to forecast human behavior with far greater accuracy than before. The predictive record of the Office of National Estimates was, however, decidedly mixed. Kent’s methodological rigor enabled him to professionalize U.S. intelligence analysis, making him a model in today’s “post-truth” climate, but his failures offer a cautionary tale for those who insist that technology will soon reveal the future.

Keywords

National Security; Analytics and Data Science; Analysis; Forecasting and Prediction; History

Citation

Scoblic, J. Peter. "Beacon and Warning: Sherman Kent, Scientific Hubris, and the CIA's Office of National Estimates." Texas National Security Review 1, no. 4 (August 2018).
  • Read Now

More from the Author

    • 2020
    • Faculty Research

    Strategic Foresight as Dynamic Capability: A New Lens on Knightian Uncertainty

    By: J. Peter Scoblic
    • October 8, 2017
    • Washington Post

    The Watergate Trap: Seeing So Much of the Present through Watergate Makes It Harder to See the Future

    By: J. Peter Scoblic
    • May 2017
    • American Economic Review

    Sacred versus Pseudo-sacred Values: How People Cope with Taboo Trade-Offs

    By: Philip E. Tetlock, Barbara A. Mellers and J. Peter Scoblic
More from the Author
  • Strategic Foresight as Dynamic Capability: A New Lens on Knightian Uncertainty By: J. Peter Scoblic
  • The Watergate Trap: Seeing So Much of the Present through Watergate Makes It Harder to See the Future By: J. Peter Scoblic
  • Sacred versus Pseudo-sacred Values: How People Cope with Taboo Trade-Offs By: Philip E. Tetlock, Barbara A. Mellers and J. Peter Scoblic
ǁ
Campus Map
Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
→Map & Directions
→More Contact Information
  • Make a Gift
  • Site Map
  • Jobs
  • Harvard University
  • Trademarks
  • Policies
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College