Publications
Publications
  • September 2018
  • Article
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine

What Does It Take to Change an Editor's Mind? Identifying Minimally Important Difference Thresholds for Peer Reviewer Rating Scores of Scientific Articles

By: Michael Callaham and Leslie John
  • Format:Print
ShareBar

Abstract

Study objective—We define a minimally important difference for the Likert-type scores frequently used in scientific peer review (similar to existing minimally important differences for scores in clinical medicine). To our knowledge, the magnitude of score change required to change editorial decisions has not been studied.

Keywords

Information Publishing; Journals and Magazines; Science; Decision Making

Citation

Callaham, Michael, and Leslie John. "What Does It Take to Change an Editor's Mind? Identifying Minimally Important Difference Thresholds for Peer Reviewer Rating Scores of Scientific Articles." Annals of Emergency Medicine 72, no. 3 (September 2018): 314–318.e2.

About The Author

Leslie K. John

Negotiation, Organizations & Markets
More Publications

More from the Authors