Viacom: Democratization of Data Science

Shane  Greenstein; Christine  Snively

Case | HBS Case Collection | January 2018

Viacom: Democratization of Data Science

by Shane Greenstein and Christine Snively

Abstract

In two short years, Viacom’s Data Science & Advanced Analytics team built a web platform called Science Central that allowed employees from Viacom’s 20+ cable networks to access television audience insights through three data science apps. In the past, employees would have approached the team to carry out these requests. Vice President of Data and Audience Development Fabio Luzzi, who oversaw the 10-person team, believed that making data science instantly available in accessible formats would allow teams to make better-informed decisions. By June 2017, the platform had 600 regular users, but Luzzi wanted to expand its reach. He considered whether the team should focus on strengthening the platform or devote more resources to custom analytics requests that would allow the team to explore new problems and develop new insights.

Keywords: data science; big data; Technology Platform; Data and Data Sets; Expansion; Strategic Planning;

Language: English

Format: Print

28 pages

Educators Purchase

Citation:

Greenstein, Shane, and Christine Snively. "Viacom: Democratization of Data Science." Harvard Business School Case 618-016, January 2018.

By August 2015, two-year-old mobile imaging software startup Lightricks had developed and released two best-selling paid mobile apps, grown to a team of 30, earned a revenue run rate of nearly $10 million, and achieved modest profitability. The bootstrapped company had explored raising funds, met with venture capital firms, and was presented with a term sheet. The cofounders believed the financing would allow them to scale up quicker, but they also worried about losing control of their company.

In 2019, Fitbit lost its leadership in the wearable sensor market to Apple and to cheaper alternatives.
Why did it lose its market position?
How will the proposed acquisition affect it and Google?

This study provides an analysis of the entry strategies of third-party data centers in the United States, an industry with assets worth hundreds of billions of dollars. We examine the market in 2018 and 2019, and compare with the physical entry of private data centers for services on demand, including those known as cloud services. We find evidence that providers of third-party data centers trade off the tensions between buyer distaste for distance, which creates localized demand, and costs of supply, which vary with density. We find considerable evidence that localized demand and economies of scale shape entry decisions. We conclude that data centers display tendencies towards urban-biased technical change, and cloud services mildly work to ameliorate such biases. We see little evidence to suggest data centers will spread to any but a small number of low density locations.

Faculty & Research

Viacom: Democratization of Data Science

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author