CEOs Should Get Personally Involved in Talent Development

Frank V. Cespedes; Jay  Galeota; Michael  Wong

Article | ChiefExecutive.net | August 31, 2017

CEOs Should Get Personally Involved in Talent Development

by Frank V. Cespedes, Jay Galeota and Michael Wong

Abstract

Estimates indicate that, globally, human capital has a value about 2.3 times that of physical capital. This difference is likely to widen in increasingly service-driven economies. Yet, most companies maintain their equipment better than their people. The issue is not good intentions. Executives repeatedly cite employees as critical for success; we rarely hear them mention picking a software package or supplier in the same way. But rigorous processes are typically in place for software and supplier selection, not for many core staff activities. This article discusses three levers available for senior executives to use in setting the foundational conditions for talent development—business reviews, more sophisticated talent profile tools, involvement in training—and how some companies are utilizing these levers.

Keywords: Talent and Talent Management; Employees; Training;

Format: Electronic

Read Now

Citation:

Cespedes, Frank V., Jay Galeota, and Michael Wong. "CEOs Should Get Personally Involved in Talent Development." ChiefExecutive.net (August 31, 2017).

Fred Shilmover and Sam Clemens prepared for their fourth quarter board meeting. They were excited to have scaled their software startup, InsightSquared, to $2 million in revenue and secured an $8 million round of venture capital. However, they disagreed on the path ahead, specifically on the sales and marketing plan. Shilmover preferred a sales-centric approach to growth while Clemens preferred a marketing-centric one. Which strategy was optimal for their venture’s next phase of growth?

Shindigz provides party and celebratory items for various occasions and events through its branded online channel, through third-party retail and wholesale channels, and external online marketplaces. The case focuses on pricing challenges facing a venture with an historically premium-priced strategy in an ecommerce environment where promotions and discounts have become the norm. The case concerns the interaction of branding, channel, and pricing in a firm as well as the impact of Amazon Prime on consumer expectations for “free” shipping from vendors.

In 2011, Canibal launched a machine that could sort and compress aluminum cans, plastic bottles, and cups. Users could play a jackpot-style game on the machine’s digital display, while disposing of their beverage containers and earning coupons or other rewards. The machine could also display advertising or serve as a communication tool. In 2016, the company's new machine, the i3, had more potential than earlier models, due to enhanced reliability and displays that could allow Canibal to pursue new markets. Benoit Paget, CEO and founder of Canibal, must choose a growth path: which customer segment should he focus on? How should he position his product? What would be the implications of these choices for marketing and sales requirements, pricing, and funding?

Faculty & Research

CEOs Should Get Personally Involved in Talent Development

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author