Finding the Middle Ground: Curvilinear Associations Between Positive Affect Variability and Daily Cortisol Profiles

L.J.  Human; A.V.  Whillans; C.  Hoppmann; P.  Klumb; S.S.  Dickerson; E.W.  Dunn

Article | Emotion

Finding the Middle Ground: Curvilinear Associations Between Positive Affect Variability and Daily Cortisol Profiles

by L.J. Human, A.V. Whillans, C. Hoppmann, P. Klumb, S.S. Dickerson and E.W. Dunn

Abstract

There is growing evidence that there are stable and meaningful individual differences in how much people vary in their experience of positive affect (PA), which in turn may have implications for health and well-being. Does such PA variability play a role in physiological processes potentially related to stress and health, such as daily cortisol profiles? We explored this question by examining whether PA variability across and within days in middle-aged adults (Study 1) and across weeks in older adults (Study 2) was associated with daily salivary cortisol profiles. In both studies, individuals who exhibited moderate PA variability demonstrated more favorable cortisol profiles, such as lower levels of cortisol and steeper slopes. Interestingly, for middle-aged adults (Study 1), high levels of within-day PA variability were associated with the least favorable cortisol profiles, whereas for older adults (Study 2), low levels of across-week PA variability were associated with the least favorable cortisol profiles. Collectively, these findings provide some of the first evidence that PA variability is related to daily cortisol profiles, suggesting that it may be better to experience a moderate degree of positive affect variability. Too much or too little variability, however, may be problematic, potentially carrying negative implications for stress-related physiological responding.

Keywords: positive affect; intraindividual variability; daily cortisol profiles; Health;

Format: Print

Find at Harvard

Citation:

Human, L.J., A.V. Whillans, C. Hoppmann, P. Klumb, S.S. Dickerson, and E.W. Dunn. "Finding the Middle Ground: Curvilinear Associations Between Positive Affect Variability and Daily Cortisol Profiles." Emotion 15, no. 6 (December 2015): 705–720.

Dramatic reductions in carbon emissions must take place immediately. A human-centric method of reducing environmental impacts is to “nudge” individuals away from single-occupancy vehicle (SOVs) commutes toward more sustainable ones. While an abundance of research has focused on external determinants of mode choice, we know much less about the behavioral determinants. The field of behavioral science is therefore overdue for a focus on transportation. First, we describe the founding of our multidisciplinary research team. Next, we describe barriers to behavior change and outline lessons learned. Lastly, we describe how COVID-19 has shaped this research. This paper is meant to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policy makers in order to develop a behaviorally-informed framework that can be leveraged by policymakers, government, and organizations worldwide.

Spending money on time-saving services can improve happiness and reduce stress. Yet many people do not spend money to save time even when they can afford to do so, potentially because they feel guilty about paying other people to complete disliked tasks on their behalf. Consistent with this proposition, we find evidence that individuals are most likely to experience guilt when outsourcing to a salient service provider. Across two large-scale surveys of working adults, including a nationally representative sample of employed Americans (Study 1a & 1b, N = 1,140), individuals reported greater guilt when they thought about outsourcing to a salient (vs. non-salient) service provider. Using a novel lab paradigm, participants felt greater guilt when the service provider was salient, which in turn undermined their willingness to buy time (Study 2, N = 350). In Study 3, these effects were mitigated by emphasizing the benefits of task completion for the service provider (N = 390). This research points to the potential of simple interventions to help organizations encourage individuals to make time-saving purchases.

With the pandemic forcing millions of Americans into financial distress, it is only natural to want to lend friends and family a hand. But giving them a gift to help them out can do a lot of harm—unless you do it the right way.

Faculty & Research

Finding the Middle Ground: Curvilinear Associations Between Positive Affect Variability and Daily Cortisol Profiles

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author