Committed and Flexible Resources

Robert S. Kaplan

Background Note | HBS Case Collection | February 1997 (Revised June 1999)

Committed and Flexible Resources

Abstract

Stresses the difference between costs committed in advance of knowing actual demand (committed costs) and cost incurred proportional to demand. Committed costs appear fixed since their supply is independent of the amount actually used. Flexible resources are supplied as needed, so their costs appear to be variable with demand. Shows how committed costs can be reduced via a two-step procedure: 1) reduce the demand for the activities performed by these committed resources, thereby creating unused capacity; and 2) manage the excess capacity of committed resources--either by reducing their supply or by deploying these resources to alternative and more profitable uses.

Keywords: Cost;

Format: Print

3 pages

Find at Harvard

Citation:

Kaplan, Robert S. "Committed and Flexible Resources." Harvard Business School Background Note 197-078, February 1997. (Revised June 1999.)

During the past 50 years, several consulting companies introduced important new ideas that extended management theory and improved management practice. This paper draws upon public sources and the authors’ personal experiences to describe how three management consulting companies created and sustained several big management ideas. The consulting organizations identified companies that had introduced an innovation to address a practice gap or anomaly. It then described the innovation in articles, cases, and public conferences, and proceeded to help a new set of companies implement the management innovation, which led to enhancements in the original innovation that made it more understandable, generalizable, and robust. The consulting leaders sustained their thought-leadership positions by creating an ecosystem with senior executives at pioneer corporations and academic/thought leaders. The paper also describes how other consulting companies did not sustain an initial thought-leadership position because of a failure to recognize the synergistic interplay between knowledge application and knowledge creation.

Medtronic is adapting its strategy to changes in health care competition and payments. It has decided to develop new relationships with payers, hospitals, and physicians to become more accountable for patient outcomes and total costs. The case describes new forms of partnerships for therapy optimization, management of acute care episodes, and management of chronic care patients.The case also illustrates how integrated practice units (IPUs) provide focused, comprehensive care for two high-volume and expensive medical conditions: type-1 diabetes and morbid obesity.

A gerontologist in Kaiser Permanente’s Colorado region is concerned with the high and growing cost of treating the elderly population. She introduces a new care model, Primary Care Plus, using an interdisciplinary team of a primary care doctor, palliative care specialist, nurse coordinator, clinical pharmacy specialist, and behavioral and social service specialists. The team focuses on the highest-risk patients to see if the new, pro-active care model can improve patient, family, and provider satisfaction and lower Kaiser Permanente’s total cost of care for this patient segment.

Faculty & Research

Committed and Flexible Resources

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author