Introduction to Activity-Based Costing

Robert S. Kaplan

Background Note | HBS Case Collection | February 1997 (Revised July 2001)

Introduction to Activity-Based Costing

Abstract

Introduces the fundamental notions of activity-based costing (ABC). Motivates ABC by means of a simple example, a single and a diversified pen factory. Proceeds to show how ABC assigns costs more accurately to products and customers by: 1) identifying the activities being performed by organizational resources; 2) assigning resource costs to the activities; 3) identifying all the products, services, and customers of the organization; and 4) assigning activity costs to these outputs via activity cost drivers. Also covers activity attributes, such as the cost hierarchy, value and non-value added, and business processes, as well as different types of activity cost drivers: transaction, duration, and intensity. Closes with the admonition to balance the benefits from more accurate cost estimates with the cost of developing an appropriate activity-based cost system.

Keywords: Activity Based Costing and Management;

Format: Print

14 pages

Educators Purchase

Citation:

Kaplan, Robert S. "Introduction to Activity-Based Costing." Harvard Business School Background Note 197-076, February 1997. (Revised July 2001.)

This note was written to provide students with fundamental concepts and methods for the analysis of cost variances. It focuses on the decomposition of cost variances into price, quantity, and mix variance components, an approach that allows students to identify the root causes of differences between expected and actual costs.

During the past 50 years, several consulting companies introduced important new ideas that extended management theory and improved management practice. This paper draws upon public sources and the authors’ personal experiences to describe how three management consulting companies created and sustained several big management ideas. The consulting organizations identified companies that had introduced an innovation to address a practice gap or anomaly. It then described the innovation in articles, cases, and public conferences and proceeded to help a new set of companies implement the management innovation, which led to enhancements in the original innovation that made it more understandable, generalizable, and robust. The consulting leaders sustained their thought-leadership positions by creating an ecosystem with senior executives at pioneer corporations and academic/thought leaders. The paper also describes how other consulting companies did not sustain an initial thought-leadership position because of a failure to recognize the synergistic interplay between knowledge application and knowledge creation.

Medtronic is adapting its strategy to changes in health care competition and payments. It has decided to develop new relationships with payers, hospitals, and physicians to become more accountable for patient outcomes and total costs. The case describes new forms of partnerships for therapy optimization, management of acute care episodes, and management of chronic care patients. The case also illustrates how integrated practice units (IPUs) provide focused, comprehensive care for two high-volume and expensive medical conditions: type-1 diabetes and morbid obesity.

Faculty & Research

Introduction to Activity-Based Costing

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author