Environmental Demands and the Emergence of Social Structure

Adam   Tatarynowicz; Maxim   Sytch; Ranjay  Gulati

Article | Administrative Science Quarterly | March 2016

Environmental Demands and the Emergence of Social Structure: Technological Dynamism and Interorganizational Network Forms

by Adam Tatarynowicz, Maxim Sytch and Ranjay Gulati

Abstract

This study investigates the origins of variation in the structures of interorganizational networks across industries. We combine empirical analyses of existing interorganizational networks in six industries with an agent-based simulation model of network emergence. Using data on technology partnerships from 1983 to 1999 among firms in the automotive, biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, chemicals, microelectronics, new materials, and telecommunications industries, we find that differences in technological dynamism across industries and the concomitant demands for value creation engender variations in firms’ collaborative behaviors. On average, firms in technologically dynamic industries pursue more-open ego networks, which fosters access to new and diverse resources that help sustain continuous innovation. In contrast, firms in technologically stable industries on average pursue more-closed ego networks, which fosters reliable collaboration and helps preserve existing resources. We show that because of the observed cross-industry differences in firms’ collaborative behaviors, the emergent industry-wide networks take on distinct structural forms. Technologically stable industries feature clan networks, characterized by low network connectedness and rather strong community structures. Technologically dynamic industries feature community networks, characterized by high network connectedness and medium-to-strong community structures. Convention networks, which feature high network connectedness and weak community structures, were not evident among the empirical networks we examined. Taken together, our findings advance an environmental contingency theory of network formation, which proposes a close association between the characteristics of actors’ environment and the processes of network formation among actors.

Keywords: interorganizatonal relationships; social networks; network emergence; interorganizational networks; Technology; Networks; Organizational Structure; Social and Collaborative Networks;

Format: Print

Find at Harvard

Citation:

Tatarynowicz, Adam, Maxim Sytch, and Ranjay Gulati. "Environmental Demands and the Emergence of Social Structure: Technological Dynamism and Interorganizational Network Forms." Administrative Science Quarterly 61, no. 1 (March 2016): 52–86.

Why do some startups that have crossed the threshold of “product-market fit” and have a viable business model still fail? This article begins by exploring the argument that most startups need more professionalization to thrive. Founders resist putting in place structures and systems as they grow and that eventually leads to organizational chaos and ultimately, failure. But it then departs from this conventional view and explores the idea that while on the one hand too little structure in a high growth venture can lead to chaos, going too far on the other extreme with too much structure can also be equally detrimental and kill the soul of the startup. The article concludes by summarizing some ideas for startup founders on how they can learn the mechanics of scaling up effectively before they reach a point where they tip over too far, in one direction or the other. In an attempt to better understand this problem, the authors conducted a closed-group discussion with professionals, investors, and founders operating in various segments of the Indian startup ecosystem on which this article is based.

Faculty & Research

Environmental Demands and the Emergence of Social Structure: Technological Dynamism and Interorganizational Network Forms

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author