Clef Company: Turnover

Frank V. Cespedes

Teaching Note | HBS Case Collection | October 2015

Clef Company: Turnover

Abstract

Clef Company sells keys and other products to retail outlets, which then sell these products to consumers. The case concerns turnover in Clef's sales force in the context of company strategy, financial performance, and a day in the life of a Clef salesperson. Among other things, the case is about managing people but also a certain aggregate call capacity. It illustrates important links (in many companies, not just Clef) between consumer buying behavior, a firm's strategy, and the role of personal selling in that strategy. In turn, analysis of those links places the turnover issue in a new light while raising additional issues concerning the human-resource implications of management's (very profitable) sales policies.

Keywords: Sales; Marketing; Strategy; Marketing Strategy; Performance Evaluation; Retail Industry; Consumer Products Industry; United States;

Language: English

Format: Print

15 pages

Purchase

Citation:

Cespedes, Frank V. "Clef Company: Turnover." Harvard Business School Teaching Note 816-046, October 2015.

Common advice in sales is to provide insights to customers during sales calls. But this advice generally stays at the level of “tell people something they don’t already know” and results in sales conversations littered with many irrelevant factoids. This article provides examples of how salespeople develop and deliver resonant insights in customer conversations and why the framing of insights depends upon to whom they are talking and when in the sales cycle.

Most research and training in sales focus on acquiring new customers. But winning back previous customers is increasingly important: mergers, choice in supply chains, and uncertainty about trade wars mean that B2B customers are constantly re-evaluating relationships with suppliers and making changes. Meanwhile, large buyers account, on average, for over 25% of revenues at publicly traded firms, up from 10% in the 1980s. This article discusses how and why the process for reacquiring lost customers requires a different approach than acquiring new ones and illustrates the process and its implications via a case example.

Fred Shilmover and Sam Clemens prepared for their fourth quarter board meeting. They were excited to have scaled their software startup, InsightSquared, to $2 million in revenue and secured an $8 million round of venture capital. However, they disagreed on the path ahead, specifically on the sales and marketing plan. Shilmover preferred a sales-centric approach to growth while Clemens preferred a marketing-centric one. Which strategy was optimal for their venture’s next phase of growth?

Faculty & Research

Clef Company: Turnover

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author