Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning
Citation:
Serafeim, George, and David Freiberg. "Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning." Harvard Business School Teaching Note 117-037, October 2016. View Details|
Case HBS Case Collection August 2015 (Revised October 2017) Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A) |
Abstract
Erik Osmundsen, CEO of Norsk Gjenvinning (NG), had initiated a program to eliminate corruption and improve compliance, and as a result the company had experienced a turnover of almost half of its top 70 line managers and strained relations with several competitors and the waste management industry association. Osmundsen had relentlessly pushed an agenda that involved transforming and professionalizing the waste management industry to mitigate instances of corruption and other crimes. Osmundsen was convinced that his turnaround strategy would be effective. Having brought employees on board, he was planning to relentlessly engage customers, regulators, and security agencies. It was still unclear though how fast customer demand for robust compliance programs would affect the competitive dynamics. How should NG go about convincing its customers? What could NG learn from companies in other industries that have relied on customer support to shift to responsible business practices? Did competitors that maintain non-compliant practices have an Achilles heel that NG could exploit? To what degree should NG drive change on its own in order to achieve customer differentiation vs. cooperate with competitors to bring the whole industry on board? What other mechanisms existed to level the playing field if NG did not succeed in convincing the customers?
Keywords: change management; change leadership; Crime and Corruption; governance; Compliance; waste management; Environmental Impact; social responsibility; industry regulation; regulatory enforcement; Leading Change; Change Management; Crime and Corruption; Governance Compliance; Wastes and Waste Processing;
Citation:
Serafeim, George, and Shannon Gombos. "Turnaround at Norsk Gjenvinning (A)." Harvard Business School Case 116-012, August 2015. (Revised October 2017.)
