Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Faculty & Research
  • Faculty
  • Research
  • Featured Topics
  • Academic Units
  • …→
  • Harvard Business School→
  • Faculty & Research→
Publications
Publications
  • June 2016
  • Article
  • Administrative Science Quarterly

Task Segregation as a Mechanism for Within-Job Inequality: Women and Men of the Transportation Security Administration

By: Curtis K. Chan and Michel Anteby
  • Format:Print
ShareBar

Abstract

What could explain inequality within a given job between groups of workers, particularly between women and men? Extant workplace inequality scholarship has largely overlooked as a source for inequality the job’s work content—the actual tasks workers perform. It is possible, however, for a job to have considerably heterogeneous tasks and for particular tasks to be differentially allocated by worker group. We deem this possibility “task segregation”—when a group of workers is disproportionately allocated to spend more time doing particular tasks within a job. If these tasks are relatively undesirable, then the segregated group may have relatively poorer job quality. Drawing on interviews with airport security screeners, we analyze a case of task segregation and the processes through which it generated inequality in job quality. Relative to male screeners, female screeners were more often allocated the reportedly undesirable task of passenger pat-downs, disproportionately exposing them to processes of physical exertion, emotional labor, and relational strain. Task segregation also disproportionately exposed female screeners to processes of managerial sanction and skillset narrowing that further contributed to poor job quality for women. Overall, we build theory around how task segregation can act as a mechanism for generating within-job inequality in job quality.

Keywords

Inequality; Work; Mechanisms And Processes; Gender; Stratification; Labor Process; Qualitative Methods (general); Case Method; Field Research; Equality And Inequality; Working Conditions; Gender; Labor; Labor And Management Relations; Air Transportation Industry

Citation

Chan, Curtis K., and Michel Anteby. "Task Segregation as a Mechanism for Within-Job Inequality: Women and Men of the Transportation Security Administration." Administrative Science Quarterly 61, no. 2 (June 2016): 184–216.
  • Read Now

More from the Authors

    • 2016
    • Faculty Research

    Wrong Paths to Right: Defining Morality With or Without a Clear Red Line

    By: Ryann Elizabeth Manning and Michel Anteby
    • Faculty Research

    Overview

    • Faculty Research

    The Meaning-Making of Meaningful Work

More from the Authors
  • Wrong Paths to Right: Defining Morality With or Without a Clear Red Line By: Ryann Elizabeth Manning and Michel Anteby
  • Overview 
  • The Meaning-Making of Meaningful Work 
ǁ
Campus Map
Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
→Map & Directions
→More Contact Information
  • Make a Gift
  • Site Map
  • Jobs
  • Harvard University
  • Trademarks
  • Policies
  • Digital Accessibility
Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College