More from these Authors

• Case | HBS Case Collection | December 2020

  Prime Coalition: Catalytic Capital for Climate Innovation

  Ramana Nanda, Benjamin N. Roth and Olivia Hull

  With long development timelines and high risk, new energy technologies were often left to languish in the “valley of death,” unable to raise enough funds to bring a product to market. In 2014, Sarah Kearney founded the nonprofit Prime Coalition to solve this problem. At the beginning, Prime’s role as a financial intermediary involved seeking out the most promising market-based technology solutions to climate change and recruiting foundations or philanthropists to fund them. In 2019, Prime changed course, adopting a portfolio approach with its Prime Impact Fund. By the end of the year, Prime had raised $40 million in philanthropic capital for its new fund. Once the funds were invested in promising energy startups, Prime planned to try its hand at recruiting traditional investors to back the same companies. Could Kearney convince traditional investors that these investments were worth the risks?

  Keywords: Energy Industry; Technology Industry; Green Technology Industry;

  Citation:

  Nanda, Ramana, Benjamin N. Roth, and Olivia Hull. "Prime Coalition: Catalytic Capital for Climate Innovation." Harvard Business School Case 820-007, February 2020.  View Details

  CiteView DetailsEducators

  Related

• Case | HBS Case Collection | September 2018 (Revised January 2020)

  Apple Pay and Mobile Payments in Australia (A)

  Feng Zhu, Susan Athey and David Lane

  In summer 2016, four of Australia’s top five banks petitioned regulators for permission to bargain collectively with Apple over the terms under which they would support its digital wallet, Apple Pay. They argued that doing so would force concessions from Apple that would improve market competitiveness, consumer choice, price transparency, and transaction security for all mobile payments in Australia. The banks stood to benefit as well. If they succeeded in their primary aim of opening the contactless payment functionality of Apple’s devices to their own digital wallets—something Apple had thus far refused in any market it had entered—the banks could retain customer relationships that Apple Pay threatened to usurp and limit Apple’s free-riding on the contactless payment infrastructure the banks had just spent several years building.

  Keywords: payment methods; mobile payment; digital platforms; Apple; Banks and Banking; Cooperation; Problems and Challenges; Policy; Banking Industry; Australia;

  Citation:

  Zhu, Feng, Susan Athey, and David Lane. "Apple Pay and Mobile Payments in Australia (A)." Harvard Business School Case 619-010, September 2018. (Revised January 2020.)  View Details

  CiteView DetailsEducatorsPurchase

  Related

• Supplement | HBS Case Collection | September 2018 (Revised January 2020)

  Apple Pay and Mobile Payments in Australia (B)

  Feng Zhu, Susan Athey and David Lane

  Supplements the (A) case.

  Keywords: payment methods; mobile payment; digital platforms; Apple; Banks and Banking; Cooperation; Problems and Challenges; Policy; Banking Industry; Australia;

  Citation:

  Zhu, Feng, Susan Athey, and David Lane. "Apple Pay and Mobile Payments in Australia (B)." Harvard Business School Supplement 619-011, September 2018. (Revised January 2020.)  View Details

  CiteView DetailsPurchase

  Related