Making a Difference Matters: Impact Unlocks the Emotional Benefits of Prosocial Spending

Lara B. Aknin; Elizabeth W.  Dunn; Ashley V. Whillans; Adam M. Grant; Michael I. Norton

Article | Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization | April 2013

Making a Difference Matters: Impact Unlocks the Emotional Benefits of Prosocial Spending

by Lara B. Aknin, Elizabeth W. Dunn, Ashley V. Whillans, Adam M. Grant and Michael I. Norton

Abstract

When does giving lead to happiness? Here, we present two studies demonstrating that the emotional benefits of spending money on others (prosocial spending) are unleashed when givers are aware of their positive impact. In Study 1, an experiment using real charitable appeals, giving more money to charity led to higher levels of happiness only when participants gave to causes that explained how these funds are used to make a difference in the life of a recipient. In Study 2, participants were asked to reflect upon a time they spent money on themselves or on others in a way that either had a positive impact or had no impact. Participants who recalled a time they spent on others that had a positive impact were happiest. Together, these results suggest that highlighting the impact of prosocial spending can increase the emotional rewards of giving.

Keywords: prosocial spending; prosocial impact; subjective well being; happiness; donations; Happiness; Philanthropy and Charitable Giving;

Format: Print

Find at Harvard Read Now

Citation:

Aknin, Lara B., Elizabeth W. Dunn, Ashley V. Whillans, Adam M. Grant, and Michael I. Norton. "Making a Difference Matters: Impact Unlocks the Emotional Benefits of Prosocial Spending." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 88 (April 2013): 90–95.

Each year across North America, millions of graduates have to make tradeoffs between time and money as they plan their next steps. Despite the importance of these choices, we know surprisingly little about how people navigate major life decisions that involve making more money at the expense of having less time, and vice versa. Researchers asked more than 1,000 graduating college students in Canada whether they generally prioritized time or money. They found that students who prioritized time at graduation were happier and more satisfied with their careers 1 to 2 years later than those who prioritized money. They explored why that might be and how factors like financial security and student debt play a role in people’s decision-making and happiness.

Working Paper | HBS Working Paper Series | 2019

Connecting the Dots: Superordinate Framing Enhances the Value of Unimportant Tasks

Jaewon Yoon, A.V. Whillans and Ed O'Brien

Each day, people begrudgingly complete mundane tasks. Four experiments (N = 3,502; two pre-registered) reveal that a simple intervention—superordinate framing—can enhance people’s task experiences. In two initial experiments, working adults were asked to describe unimportant, meaningless work tasks. Some participants reflected on how these tasks acted like puzzle pieces, connecting with other tasks to achieve a broader purpose (superordinate condition). Others reflected on the broad purpose of the unimportant task (purpose condition) or were assigned to a no-framing control condition. Participants in the superordinate condition reported greater joy, meaning, and motivation from the task compared to participants assigned to the purpose or control conditions (Experiments 1-2). This effect was moderated by task type, such that superordinate (vs. purpose) framing increased the enjoyment of unimportant but not important tasks (Experiment 2). Two additional experiments replicated these findings using real-time work tasks, and generalized to two kinds of superordinate frames: superordinate framing enhanced participants’ task experience regardless of whether they reflected on how their own tasks fit together over time (i.e., how their work now will combine with their own future work) or how their own tasks fit with others’ tasks (i.e., how their work will combine with others’ work; Experiments 3-4). Participants who viewed their task through a superordinate lens also demanded a higher wage for participation—providing further evidence that they valued these tasks more (Experiment 4). These findings highlight a costless psychological intervention that can boost people’s enjoyment of otherwise mundane and demotivating tasks.

Keywords: superordinate framing; Employees; Motivation and Incentives; Goals and Objectives; Mission and Purpose; Perspective;

Citation:

Yoon, Jaewon, A.V. Whillans, and Ed O'Brien. "Connecting the Dots: Superordinate Framing Enhances the Value of Unimportant Tasks." Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 20-011, July 2019. View Details

Cite View Details Read Now

Managers constantly encourage employees to think about why they do the work they do in order to give them a sense of purpose and fight against demotivation. But our latest research—with nearly 4,000 working adults in the U.S.—suggests that this hyperfocus on purpose can backfire. Constantly hearing messages about making an impact actually risks leading employees to ruminate about their work’s lack of impact. Building on Gestalt principles in psychology, we offer a solution: thinking about how seemingly unimportant work belongs to a set of tasks contributing to a broader goal (i.e., superordinate framing) could help employees see their true value.

Faculty & Research

Making a Difference Matters: Impact Unlocks the Emotional Benefits of Prosocial Spending

Abstract

Citation:

About the Authors

More from these Authors