The New Patent Intermediaries: Platforms, Defensive Aggregators and Super-Aggregators

Andrei  Hagiu; David B. Yoffie

Article | Journal of Economic Perspectives | Winter 2013

The New Patent Intermediaries: Platforms, Defensive Aggregators and Super-Aggregators

Abstract

The patent market consists mainly of privately negotiated, bilateral transactions, either sales or cross-licenses, between large companies. There is no eBay, Amazon, New York Stock Exchange, or Kelley's Blue Book equivalent for patents, and when buyers and sellers do manage to find each other, they usually negotiate under enormous uncertainty: prices of similar patents vary widely from transaction to transaction, and the terms of the transactions (including prices) are often secret and confidential. Inefficient and illiquid markets, such as the one for patents, generally create profit opportunities for intermediaries. We begin with an overview of the problems that arise in patent markets, and how traditional institutions like patent brokers, patent pools, and standard-setting organizations have sought to address them. During the last decade, a variety of novel patent intermediaries have emerged. We discuss how several online platforms have started services for buying and selling patents but have failed to gain meaningful traction. And new intermediaries that we call defensive patent aggregators and super-aggregators have become quite influential and controversial in the technology industries they touch. The goal of this paper is to shed light on the role and efficiency tradeoffs of these new patent intermediaries. Finally, we offer a provisional assessment of how the new patent intermediary institutions affect economic welfare.

Keywords: intellectual property; patents; platforms; intermediaries; aggregator; Patents; Market Platforms; Marketplace Matching; Distribution Channels;

Format: Print

Find at Harvard Read Now

Citation:

Hagiu, Andrei, and David B. Yoffie. "The New Patent Intermediaries: Platforms, Defensive Aggregators and Super-Aggregators." Journal of Economic Perspectives 27, no. 1 (Winter 2013): 45–66.

Many observers worried about what would happen to Apple when Steve Jobs died in 2011. But Apple had performed above everyone’s expectations in Cook’s six years as CEO. Apple’s core business – the iPhone – continued to deliver spectacular results. In addition, Cook was aggressively introducing new products, ranging from Apple Watch to HomePod. Cook also had the world’s biggest balance sheet to invest in new technologies and markets. The total number of products in Apple’s portfolio had doubled (from roughly 20 to 40) under Tim Cook. The question for Cook in 2018 was no longer, ‘can Apple thrive without Steve Jobs,’ but rather ‘can Apple move beyond a one-trick pony (iPhone)’?

In March 2016, Donna Dubinsky (co-founder and CEO) and Jeff Hawkins (co-founder) were struggling with a key question: Could Numenta be successful in both creating fundamental technology and building a commercial business? Located in Redwood City, CA, Numenta was founded in 2005 to expand Hawkins' research on the human brain, with the goal of "reverse engineering the neocortex" and then creating machines based on biological principals. Ultimately, Hawkins believed that Numenta could be a catalyst in creating intelligent machines that would lay the foundation for the next generation of computing with potentially broad ranging commercial opportunities.

Faculty & Research

The New Patent Intermediaries: Platforms, Defensive Aggregators and Super-Aggregators

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author