Teaming at GE Aviation

Rakesh  Khurana; Jeffrey  Polzer; Willy  Shih; Eric  Baldwin

Case | HBS Case Collection | November 2012

Teaming at GE Aviation

by Rakesh Khurana, Jeffrey Polzer, Willy Shih and Eric Baldwin

Abstract

Describes the challenges and successes encountered by GE's Aviation business in implementing a teaming work structure and culture in plants across its supply chain. GE Aviation leadership had seen dramatic gains in productivity, quality, and worker satisfaction in manufacturing plants where it had implemented teaming, which was designed to move decision making as close to the product as possible by delegating authority, responsibility, and accountability to front-line workers. The case describes what teaming looked like in two of GE Aviation's plants and discusses the benefits realized in teaming sites. It also describes the challenges GE Aviation leaders had encountered in implementing teaming in the face of an entrenched work structure and culture in one particular plant and discusses the difficulty management had faced in moving forward in transforming the culture of the plant.

Keywords: organizational behavior; aviation and aerospace; capacity management; competitiveness; corporate culture; corporate structure; Labor unions; Labor relations; manufacturing; organizational culture; organizational structure; Production Planning; General Electric; teaming; managing change; Transformation; Labor Unions; Organizational Change and Adaptation; Organizational Culture; Organizational Structure; Performance Productivity; Leading Change; Management Style; Job Design and Levels; Aerospace Industry; Manufacturing Industry; United States;

Language: English

Format: Print

28 pages

Educators Purchase

Citation:

Khurana, Rakesh, Jeffrey Polzer, Willy Shih, and Eric Baldwin. "Teaming at GE Aviation." Harvard Business School Case 413-074, November 2012.

This case examines the competition between ports and port operators in the Pearl River Delta over the last four decades. The cities surrounding the Pearl River estuary are the "workshop of the world," and the development of manufacturing in the region was heavily dependent on efficient container shipping. As China has opened up and drawn more direct trade traffic to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports, the operators in Hong Kong have had to adapt. More change is afoot, and Hong Kong may have to reinvent itself again.

This case describes the evolution of Kazakhstan's rail connectivity strategy post-collapse of the Soviet Union and its now central role in China's Belt and Road Initiative. This meant shifting from a north-south orientation towards east-west, as well as the development of new border-crossing facilities, special economic zones, and a new middle route that crossed the Caspian Sea. Unlike many other BRI initiatives that involved loans from China, Kazakhstan funded the modernization and upgrade by itself. Now the question was how soon demand would grow to fill the waiting capacity, as other bottlenecks on the Trans-Eurasian land route connecting China with Europe were beyond the country's control.

This case is about globalization: a Chinese company has decided to locate a production facility close to its customers in the U.S., but a recent contract bid means it will lose money, at least initially, by supplying product from that factory. The purpose of this case is to expose students to the key drivers of sourcing location choices in a global economy and the trade-offs associated with local versus offshore sourcing. It provides an opportunity to examine labor arbitrage and factor costs, as well as the practical questions of when it makes sense to ship products great distances. This is foundational for understanding international trade and globalization today, and provides the motivation for the structuring of global supply chains. Though the numbers in the case are scaled and therefore disguised, they offer a rare opportunity for students to examine realistic labor and factor cost differences between China and the United States, and to consider the broader implications of labor arbitrage, trade, and government policy. Teaching Note for HBS No. 618-007.

Faculty & Research

Teaming at GE Aviation

Abstract

Citation:

About the Authors

More from these Authors