Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Faculty & Research
  • Faculty
  • Research
  • Featured Topics
  • Academic Units
  • …→
  • Harvard Business School→
  • Faculty & Research→
Publications
Publications
  • 2010
  • Chapter
  • The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality

Backlash to Arbitration: Three Causes

By: Louis T. Wells
  • Format:Print
ShareBar

Abstract

There are at least three reasons for the current backlash among developing countries against the international regime that governs disputes between foreign investors and host governments. First is the inconsistency of the decisions rendered by arbitration panels established under bilateral investment treaties, investment provisions of regional trade agreements, clauses in investment contracts, and, occasionally, provisions of host countries' investment laws. Second, and perhaps most important, is the very rigid view of contracts that panels have tended to take, even when a host country acts as a result of an economic crisis. A third cause of backlash is closely related to the second: the seeming insensitivity of arbitration panels to signals that corruption or incompetency might have been involved in the original negotiations or subsequent renegotiations of agreements that gave rise to disputes. There are other reasons for reaction, but they pose less threat to the existing system.

Although the ideal solution would be a multilateral agreement, past efforts to conclude one suggest that reaching agreement is unlikely in the near future. Building an appellate process, providing for symmetry in access to arbitration, and mid-point guidance might go some distance toward reducing the backlash.

Keywords

Developing Countries and Economies; International Finance; Foreign Direct Investment; Agreements and Arrangements; Business and Government Relations; Conflict Management

Citation

Wells, Louis T. "Backlash to Arbitration: Three Causes." Chap. 14 in The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, edited by Michael Waibel, Asha Kaushal, Kyo-Hwa Chung, and Claire Balchin, 341–352. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2010.
  • Read Now

About The Author

Louis T. Wells

→More Publications

More from the Author

    • 2022
    • Faculty Research

    Got 'Critical Minerals'? Hooray! But Be Careful

    By: Louis T. Wells
    • 2022
    • Faculty Research

    ISDS Constrains Government Actions to Reduce Climate Change

    By: Louis T. Wells
    • 2021
    • Faculty Research

    Obsolescence of the Obsolescing Bargain: Why Governments Must Get Investor-State Contracts Right

    By: Louis T. Wells and Karl P. Sauvant
More from the Author
  • Got 'Critical Minerals'? Hooray! But Be Careful By: Louis T. Wells
  • ISDS Constrains Government Actions to Reduce Climate Change By: Louis T. Wells
  • Obsolescence of the Obsolescing Bargain: Why Governments Must Get Investor-State Contracts Right By: Louis T. Wells and Karl P. Sauvant
ǁ
Campus Map
Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
→Map & Directions
→More Contact Information
  • Make a Gift
  • Site Map
  • Jobs
  • Harvard University
  • Trademarks
  • Policies
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College