HNA Group: "A Miracle in Civil Aviation"

Cynthia A. Montgomery; Carole  Winkler

Case | HBS Case Collection | May 2005 (Revised February 2007)

HNA Group: "A Miracle in Civil Aviation"

by Cynthia A. Montgomery and Carole Winkler

Abstract

Chen Feng and three others started Hainan Airlines in China during a historic transformation and privatization of the civil aviation industry. From a small loan from the local province in 1992, Chairman Chen built the company into a conglomerate that, by 2003, owned airlines, hotels, airports, travel agencies, an insurance company, and a department store. Despite its many successes, including being the first airline in China to attract foreign capital, the company faces many challenges at both the business and corporate levels. Was the company's increasing breadth a distraction to the airline business or a route to competitive advantage? Going forward, what should be Chen's priorities?

Keywords: Growth Management; Air Transportation; Business Growth and Maturation; Competitive Advantage; Emerging Markets; Business Startups; Air Transportation Industry; China;

Format: Print

38 pages

Educators Purchase

Citation:

Montgomery, Cynthia A., and Carole Winkler. HNA Group: "A Miracle in Civil Aviation". Harvard Business School Case 705-426, May 2005. (Revised February 2007.)

Using a novel dataset that comprehensively classifies the quantitative financial disclosures in firms' 10-Ks, including those hidden in the footnotes and the MD&A, we show that disclosures of non-operating and less persistent income-statement items are both frequent and economically significant, and increasingly so over time. Adjusting GAAP earnings to exclude these items creates a measure of core earnings that is highly persistent and that forecasts future performance. Analysts and market participants are slow to impound the implications of transitory earnings. Trading strategies that exploit cross-sectional differences in firms' transitory earnings produce abnormal returns of 7-to-10% per year.

In June 2016, the board of China Vanke, one of China’s largest and best-known private residential real estate developers, must vote on a proposed acquisition that is opposed by its largest shareholders, state-owned China Resources Co. and the lesser-known property developer and financial services company Baoneng. The case describes how Baoneng amassed enough shares in Vanke to become its largest shareholder, displacing China Resources in that position. In response to Baoneng’s unwelcome advance and in support of its “railway plus property” strategy, Vanke’s management has proposed the acquisition of a unit of Shenzhen Metro, the government-owned operator of Shenzhen’s underground subway. The proposed acquisition, to be financed by issuing shares, will make Shenzhen Metro Vanke’s largest shareholder and dilute the holdings of both China Resources and Baoneng. China Resources has publicly expressed misgivings about the transaction and the board’s handling of its announcement. With three out of the 11 board seats occupied by China Resources affiliates, and a two-thirds majority needed for the proposal to pass, the vote would determine the future of Vanke.

This case centers around Qualcomm shareholders' 2012 Say-on-Pay vote and the dispute between the Institutional Shareholder Services and management regarding the appropriateness of the CEO's compensation plan. Was ISS right that Qualcomm's CEO's pay was inflated and justified by benchmarking to aspirational peers? Or was management correct that its CEO's pay is warranted by Qualcomm's recent firm performance?

Faculty & Research

HNA Group: "A Miracle in Civil Aviation"

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author