Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Faculty & Research
  • Faculty
  • Research
  • Featured Topics
  • Academic Units
  • …→
  • Harvard Business School→
  • Faculty & Research→
Publications
Publications
  • May 2008
  • Article
  • Harvard Business Review

When Winning Is Everything

By: Deepak Malhotra, Gillian Ku and J. Keith Murnighan
  • Format:Print
ShareBar

Abstract

In the heat of competition, executives can easily become obsessed with beating their rivals. This adrenaline-fueled emotional state, which the authors call competitive arousal, often leads to bad decisions. Managers can minimize the potential for competitive arousal and the harm it can inflict by avoiding certain types of interaction and targeting the causes of a win-at-all-costs approach to decision making. Through an examination of companies such as Boston Scientific and Paramount, and through research on auctions, the authors identified three principal drivers of competitive arousal: intense rivalry, especially in the form of one-on-one competitions; time pressure, found in auctions and other bidding situations, for example; and being in the spotlight - that is, working in the presence of an audience. Individually, these factors can seriously impair managerial decision making; together, their consequences can be dire, as evidenced by many high-profile business disasters. It's not possible to avoid destructive competitions and bidding wars completely. But managers can help prevent competitive arousal by anticipating potentially harmful competitive dynamics and then restructuring the deal-making process. They can also stop irrational competitive behavior from escalating by addressing the causes of competitive arousal. When rivalry is intense, for instance, managers can limit the roles of those who feel it most. They can reduce time pressure by extending or eliminating arbitrary deadlines. And they can deflect the spotlight by spreading the responsibility for critical competitive decisions among team members. Decision makers will be most successful when they focus on winning contests in which they have a real advantage - and take a step back from those in which winning exacts too high a cost.

Keywords

Decision Choices and Conditions; Auctions; Bids and Bidding; Behavior; Emotions; Personal Characteristics; Competitive Strategy; Competitive Advantage

Citation

Malhotra, Deepak, Gillian Ku, and J. Keith Murnighan. "When Winning Is Everything." Harvard Business Review 86, no. 5 (May 2008).
  • Find it at Harvard
  • Purchase

About The Author

Deepak Malhotra

Negotiation, Organizations & Markets
→More Publications

More from the Authors

    • August 2022
    • Faculty Research

    Rocket Science

    By: Joshua Schwartzstein and Deepak Malhotra
    • August 2022
    • Faculty Research

    Negotiating Peace in Colombia

    By: Deepak Malhotra and Cody Smith
    • September 2021 (Revised October 2021)
    • Faculty Research

    Project Restart: Deciding the Future of English Football

    By: Nour Kteily and Deepak Malhotra
More from the Authors
  • Rocket Science By: Joshua Schwartzstein and Deepak Malhotra
  • Negotiating Peace in Colombia By: Deepak Malhotra and Cody Smith
  • Project Restart: Deciding the Future of English Football By: Nour Kteily and Deepak Malhotra
ǁ
Campus Map
Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
→Map & Directions
→More Contact Information
  • Make a Gift
  • Site Map
  • Jobs
  • Harvard University
  • Trademarks
  • Policies
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College