Online Portals

Thomas R. Eisenmann; Sanjay  Pothen

Background Note | HBS Case Collection | December 2000

Online Portals

by Thomas R. Eisenmann and Sanjay Pothen

Abstract

Describes the online portal business model. Analyzes the model, focusing on the tactics used to acquire new users, turn new users into repeat visitors, and monetize user traffic. Explains portals' revenue and cost drivers and their implications for pursuing aggressive growth strategies. Finally, explores the challenges facing companies that aspire to develop portals for new online access technologies, such as wireless data and interactive television. To accompany teaching cases on online portals in courses on Internet strategies and e-commerce. Provides background on the online portal business model, and explains how it differs from other Internet business models. Examines the strategic choices that portals typically face. Also describes how portals can add value as consumers adopt emerging technologies, such as wireless data and interactive television.

Keywords: Business Model; Web Services Industry;

Format: Print

29 pages

Educators Purchase

Citation:

Eisenmann, Thomas R., and Sanjay Pothen. "Online Portals." Harvard Business School Background Note 801-305, December 2000.

Baroo CEO Lindsay Hyde was facing unrest from the board of her pet services startup in August 2017. One board member (and lead investor) was alarmed that Baroo’s growth was slowing while its appetite for funding was accelerating. Hyde wanted to hit the gas and continue expanding to new cities, which meant she needed to raise venture capital. How could she convince the board and potential investors that the business opportunities were too good to pass up and an infusion of capital could help her steer Baroo through the speed bumps?

Baroo CEO Lindsay Hyde must secure venture capital funding if she wants to save her pet services startup. If she is unable to finance a series A, she will need to sell or shut down.

In 2016, senior management at Moz, a venture capital-backed startup providing software tools for digital marketing professionals, must decide how to address a looming cash flow crisis precipitated by failed efforts to broaden its product line. Seattle-based Moz had originally focused only on search engine optimization (SEO) software. Aiming to accelerate growth, over the past three years the startup had launched products targeted at content marketers, social media marketers, and small local businesses. Adoption of these new products had been disappointing, and the resource drain and distraction of launching them had reduced the growth of Moz's core SEO product. Management was wrestling with whether to either: 1) shut down or sell the new products; or 2) double down on the new products, funding further investment in them by selling the core SEO business or milking it as a "cash cow."

Faculty & Research

Online Portals

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author