Boston.com

Thomas R. Eisenmann; Jon K Rust

Case | HBS Case Collection | February 2000 (Revised August 2000)

Boston.com

Abstract

How aggressively should an incumbent move when developing an online business that threatens its core product? With Internet competitors taking direct aim at the traditional print newspaper business model, the Boston Globe fought back with its own web initiative, Boston.com. Globe and Boston.com managers face decisions regarding whether and how to cross-sell print and online classified advertising; how to roll out online auctions; whether to integrate print and online editorial staff; and the pros and cons of issuing a tracking stock for the Internet businesses of the New York Time Company (the Globe's parent company). At a broader level, the case raises the question: Are old media companies doomed as the new economy dawns? It introduces the terms "hawk" vs. "dove" to describe businesses that enter the online arena by establishing wholly separate online divisions versus closely coordinating their online and "offline" activities. The case asks: Can employees trained in the traditional business shift to new, digital ways of thinking? Are legacy systems advantages or disadvantages given the need for Internet speed? Finally, what is the value of prior relationships with customers in an environment of disruptive technologies?

Keywords: Corporate Entrepreneurship; Decision Making; Change Management; Internet; Customer Relationship Management; Competitive Strategy; Publishing Industry; Information Technology Industry; United States;

Format: Print

38 pages

Educators Purchase

Citation:

Eisenmann, Thomas R., and Jon K Rust. "Boston.com." Harvard Business School Case 800-165, February 2000. (Revised August 2000.)

Fred Shilmover and Sam Clemens prepared for their fourth quarter board meeting. They were excited to have scaled their software startup, InsightSquared, to $2 million in revenue and secured an $8 million round of venture capital. However, they disagreed on the path ahead, specifically on the sales and marketing plan. Shilmover preferred a sales-centric approach to growth while Clemens preferred a marketing-centric one. Which strategy was optimal for their venture’s next phase of growth?

With one satellite aloft and in the midst of beta testing in late 2018, Analytical Space founders Justin Oliveira and Dan Nevius turned to critical questions about the pioneering startup’s go-to-market, pricing, and business development strategy. Analytical Space aimed to build and operate a constellation of inexpensive satellites that would receive and relay to the ground data gathered by orbiting Earth observation satellites, thereby speeding and increasing the amount of data their operators could collect and sell to clients in the multi-billion market for information on crops, weather, and other observable changes on Earth. The cofounders now needed to select the best initial customers, validate demand for their unique data relay service, and establish pricing that would both spur adoption and impress investors ahead of their next financing round.

Faculty & Research

Boston.com

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author