The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Development Strategy

V. Kasturi  Rangan; Marie  Bell

Case | HBS Case Collection | May 1999 (Revised December 2007)

The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Development Strategy

Abstract

Despite revenues in excess of $93 million in 1998, world-renowned Dana-Farber Cancer Institute constantly faces an operating shortfall and looks to its highly successful development office to help cover the deficit. The development office raises money annually (with a $42 million goal for 1999) through its two major fund-raising arms: the Development Fund and the Jimmy Fund. In addition, it conducts a major capital campaign about every five years. A new chief development officer, Susan Paresky, needs to establish the development strategy going forward. The case reviews the major fund-raising programs in the development office and presents additional growth options. Students examine the existing programs, assess the value of the new options, and devise a development strategy consistent with the mission and philosophy of the institute.

Keywords: Decision Choices and Conditions; Capital; Revenue; Growth and Development Strategy; Mission and Purpose; Nonprofit Organizations;

Format: Print

23 pages

Educators Purchase

Citation:

Rangan, V. Kasturi, and Marie Bell. "The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Development Strategy." Harvard Business School Case 599-104, May 1999. (Revised December 2007.)

Last Mile Health is a non-profit organization that focuses on recruiting and training community health workers to reach remote rural communities with basic health services. Founded by Raj Panjabi, a Liberian who immigrated with his family to the United States during the Liberian Civil War, the case traces the founding and early years of Last Mile Health, before the organization is faced with a choice during the Ebola outbreak in 2014: should they pursue a significant amount of new funding to expand into other areas, or should they stay focused on training community health workers.

The case describes the 25-year transformation of Peabody Essex Museum, which was created in 1993 by the merger of two sub-scale predecessor cultural institutions, operating since 1799, in Salem, Massachusetts. Dan Monroe, its founding CEO, began a process of building the institution, which, when he arrived, had a budget of $3 million and an endowment of $23 million in 1993, as compared to a budget of $33 million and an endowment of $650 million in 2018. Monroe made changes in practically every aspect of the museum’s operations as PEM broke into the ranks of the top 15 museums in the U.S. All of this was happening at a time when museums in general had lost some 20% in visitation as a result of significant shifts in population demographics and what they understood by “cultural experience.” As Dan Monroe handed off the reins of an institution that had successfully run counter to trend to his successor in 2019, the trustees of the museum and its new CEO faced the challenge of how to keep the positive momentum going—and how potentially to reinvent PEM again for a rapidly changing world.

Faculty & Research

The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Development Strategy

Abstract

Citation:

About the Author

More from the Author