Space Economics
Seminar Series
This seminar explores how economic tools can shape the future of the space economy through the lens of public-private interaction, market design, and institutional innovation—with a focus on how ownership structures affect development, governance, and long-term viability.
From satellite constellations and launch infrastructure to orbital debris, planetary resources, and data rights, we examine how ownership—formal or informal, public or private, concentrated or distributed—determines who creates and captures value in space.
By connecting economists, legal scholars, philosophers, political scientists, and space professionals, the series aims to address critical governance questions at the frontier of commercialization and national security.
Participation: Sessions will be one hour per month on Zoom. Each seminar will have a featured paper and presentation, followed by discussion. To apply to participate, please complete the application form:
Upcoming Seminars
April 21, 2026
11:00 am
From Orbit to Chips: How Space and Semiconductor Innovation Shape R&D Policy and Strategy
Giorgia Fedozzi, Infineon Technologies Austria
Past Seminars
March 26, 2026
11:00 am
Brazilian space exports and imports
Andrea Cabello, University of Brasília (Brazil)
The presenter and her coauthors analyze the role of space products in the Brazilian trade balance from the late 1990s up to 2020. They use trade balance data from Brazil and compare the performance of the space sector with the performance of the country’s trade as a whole. Exploring the challenges of extracting the relevant data from national economic metrics to effectively measure the Brazilian space sector, the author calls for a global effort to standardize data collection on space-related economic activity.
February 17, 2026
11:00 am
From Sputnik to Starship: Estimating the Learning Curve of Space Launch Technology
Alessio Terzi, University of Cambridge
Space launch costs have fallen dramatically over the past six decades, opening new economic and scientific frontiers. Yet precise, long-term estimates of these cost reductions remain sparse, and the underlying rate of technological learning is poorly understood. Using a novel dataset of historic rocket launches to date, the author tracks changes to the average cost of launching material into Low Earth Orbit and compares the technological learning curve to historical examples like steamship freight and modern solar photovoltaics.
January 20, 2026
11:00 am
The Law and Economics of Tradeable Satellite Debris Permit Market Design
Jeffrey Wagner and Mitchell Rieder, Rochester Institute of Technology
Significant growth in orbital commerce is generating satellite congestion and debris that requires policy intervention. Previous research primarily considers forms of Pigouvian taxation; however, as with carbon taxes, significant political resistance to taxes has blocked their implementation. Inspired by the recent FuelEU Maritime Regulation that restricts EU port access to ships that participate in the EU carbon emissions trading system, the authors propose that the US leverage access to its large satellite services consumer market to establish a regional satellite debris tradeable permit market that could grow into a global market.
December 16, 2025
11:00 am
Technology Spillovers from the Final Frontier: A Long-Run View of U.S. Space Innovation
Luisa Corrado
Research Fellow, University of Cambridge
Recent studies suggest that space activities generate significant economic benefits. This presentation attempts to quantify these effects by modeling both the business cycle and long-run effects driven by space sector activities. The authors developed a model in which technologies are shaped by both a dedicated R&D sector and spillovers from space-sector innovations. Using U.S. data from the 1960s to the present day, they analyze patent grants to distinguish between space and core sector technologies. By leveraging the network of patent citations, they further examine the evolving dependence between space and core technologies over time. In doing so, the authors highlight the positive impact of the aerospace sector on technological innovation and economic growth, particularly during the 1960s and 1970s.
November 18, 2025
11:00 am
Who owns the Moon, the stars, and the orbits?
Katrin Nyman Metcalf
Chair of International Relations Committee, European Space Agency
Outer space and celestial bodies can be used, but not appropriated. This basic rule of space law, codified in the 1967 Outer Space Treaty but also seen as customary law, does not clarify how to determine when use may turn into appropriation. If someone uses an orbital position, no one else can use the same - the mineral that someone extracts is not there for anyone else to extract. This is obvious, but what could not be foreseen when the treaty was written was that it would be of actual practical relevance. It is only relatively recently that space has become less infinite...at least when we look at mankind's plans for it. The issue is relevant both for space resources and for mega-constellations, already today and probably even more in the future.
October 21, 2025
Reevaluating Space-Based Solar Power as a Dispatchable Power Resource
Ely D. Sandler
Research Fellow, Harvard Kennedy School
Falling launch costs and rising electricity demand have renewed interest in space-based solar power (SBSP). However, recent cost estimates show SBSP is unlikely to compete with traditional baseload generation. Instead, SBSP could serve as a dispatchable complement to terrestrial solar—delivering power at night or under cloud cover to reduce reliance on batteries and other grid resources. While expensive compared to conventional sources, pathways exist to achieve costs below $0.20/kWh, making SBSP competitive with flexible sources like gas peaker plants in high-renewable grids. Sandler will discuss how policy can support SBSP as dispatchable rather than baseload power.
September 16, 2025
How Geopolitical Competition and Commercialization Shape Public Support for Space Funding
Lars Hornuf and Daniel Vrankar
Space has been central to geopolitics since the Cold War, driving substantial public funding worldwide. This study examines how citizens' support for space budgets is affected by comparative rhetoric about adversaries' spending and the rise of private space companies. We find that information about adversaries' space funding reduces support by nine percentage points. Most citizens show no preference between agencies and private companies, except in the U.S., where mentioning private companies instead of NASA decreases approval by 27 percentage points. These findings suggest policymakers should avoid comparative rhetoric, as it may inadvertently reduce public support for space funding.
Organizers

Ioana Petrescu
Senior Fellow, ESPI
Matthew C. Weinzierl
Joseph and Jacqueline Elbling Professor of Business Administration, Senior Associate Dean, Faculty Development and Research, Harvard Business School
Nien-hê Hsieh
Kim B. Clark Professor of Business Administration

Matija Rencelj
Research Manager, ESPI
_NRF_1%2520-%2520Croppedx2.jpg)
Tony Guidotti
Senior Researcher, The Ownership Project

Esther Cho
Researcher, The Ownership Project