Supplement | HBS Case Collection | 2009
by Jay W. Lorsch and Kaitlyn Simpson
At the 2009 Shell annual meeting, the majority of shareholders vote against the exclusive pay package. The B case compares the remuneration committee perspective (and their rationale for using discretion to award the bonuses) as well as the shareholder perspective (and their rationale for reacting so strongly against the pay package).
Keywords: Voting; Corporate Governance; Governance Controls; Executive Compensation; Business and Shareholder Relations; Perspective; Energy Industry;
Citation:
Lorsch, Jay W., and Kaitlyn Simpson. "Executive Remuneration at Royal Dutch Shell (B)." Harvard Business School Supplement 409-127, June 2009.
View Profile »View Publications »
Case | HBS Case Collection | 2013 (Revised from original 2012 version)
Olympus (A)
Jay W. Lorsch, Suraj Srinivasan and Kathleen Durante
Keywords: accounting; corporate governance; Accounting; Corporate Governance; Electronics Industry; Health Industry; Japan;
Teaching Plan | HBS Case Collection | 2013
The American National Red Cross (TP)
Jay W. Lorsch and Michael Norris
Article | HBS Alumni Bulletin | December 2012
Shareholder's Value?: Reassessing Investors' Functions
Jay W. Lorsch and Justin Fox
Keywords: "shareholders," investors; Business and Shareholder Relations;