More from the Author

• Working Paper | 2013

  Do Strict Capital Requirements Raise the Cost of Capital? Banking Regulation and the Low Risk Anomaly

  Malcolm Baker and Jeffrey Wurgler

  Minimum capital requirements are a central tool of banking regulation. Setting them balances a number of factors, including any effects on the cost of capital and in turn the rates available to borrowers. Standard theory predicts that, in perfect and efficient capital markets, reducing banks' leverage reduces the risk and cost of equity but leaves the overall weighted average cost of capital unchanged. We test these two predictions using U.S. data. We confirm that the equity of better-capitalized banks has lower systematic risk (beta) and lower idiosyncratic risk. However, over the last 40 years, lower risk banks have higher stock returns on a risk-adjusted or even a raw basis, consistent with a stock market anomaly previously documented in other samples. The size of the low risk anomaly within banks suggests that the cost of capital effects of capital requirements may be considerable. Assuming competitive lending markets, banks' low asset betas implied an average risk premium of only 40 basis points above Treasury yields in our sample period; a calibration suggests that a ten percentage-point increase in Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets may have increased this to between 100 and 130 basis points per year. In summary, the low risk anomaly in the stock market produces a potentially significant cost of capital requirements.

  Citation:

  Baker, Malcolm, and Jeffrey Wurgler. "Do Strict Capital Requirements Raise the Cost of Capital? Banking Regulation and the Low Risk Anomaly." NBER Working Paper Series, No. 19018, May 2013.

  CiteView DetailsRead Now

  Related

• Case | HBS Case Collection | 2012

  Restructuring at Nova Chemical Corporation (Abridged)

  Scott P. Mason and Malcolm Baker

  Citation:

  Mason, Scott P., and Malcolm Baker. "Restructuring at Nova Chemical Corporation (Abridged)." Harvard Business School Case 213-075, November 2012.

  CiteView Details

  Related

• Case | HBS Case Collection | 2012 (Revised from original 2005 version)

  The MCI Takeover Battle: Verizon versus Qwest

  Malcolm P. Baker and James Quinn

  MCI's board of directors is considering competing bids from Verizon and Qwest. Qwest, a smaller company with a weaker balance sheet, is offering almost a billion dollars more. But Verizon, one of the largest telecommunications companies in the world, has a history of successful mergers and acquisitions.

  Keywords: Mergers and Acquisitions; Decision Choices and Conditions; Capital Markets; Financial Strategy; Governing and Advisory Boards; Valuation; Telecommunications Industry; United States;

  Citation:

  Baker, Malcolm P., and James Quinn. "The MCI Takeover Battle: Verizon versus Qwest." Harvard Business School Case 206-045, October 2012. (Revised from original November 2005 version.)

  CiteView DetailsPurchase

  Related