More from the Author

• Working Paper | HBS Working Paper Series | 2011

  Matthew: Effect or Fable?

  Pierre Azoulay, Toby E. Stuart and Yanbo Wang

  In a market context, a status effect occurs when actors are accorded differential recognition for their efforts depending on their location in a status ordering, holding constant the quality of these efforts. In practice, because it is very difficult to measure quality, this ceteris paribus proviso often precludes convincing empirical assessments of the magnitude of status effects. We address this problem by examining the impact of a major status-conferring prize that shifts actors' positions in a prestige ordering. Specifically, using a precisely constructed matched sample, we estimate the effect of a scientist becoming a Howard Hughes Medical Investigator (HHMI) on citations to articles the scientist published before the prize was awarded. We do find evidence of a post-appointment citation boost, but the effect is small and limited to a short window of time. Consistent with theories of status, however, the effect of the prize is significantly larger when there is uncertainty about scientist and article quality.

  Keywords: Risk and Uncertainty; Status and Position; Measurement and Metrics; Quality;

  Citation:

  Azoulay, Pierre, Toby E. Stuart, and Yanbo Wang. "Matthew: Effect or Fable?" Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 12–049, December 2011.

  CiteView DetailsRead Now

  Related

• Case | HBS Case Collection | 2009 (Revised from original 2006 version)

  MassMEDIC: The Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council

  Willis M. Emmons III, Michael E. Porter and Spencer Wallace

  Set in 2004, as Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council (MassMEDIC) President Tom Sommer contemplates the future direction of a successful medical device cluster association. Focuses on the formation of cluster organizations and their roles and effectiveness, highlighting the importance of these organizations in enabling cross-cluster collaboration between firms, universities, regulators and other government officials, and other institutions. Details the events that led to the formation of MassMEDIC and the initial challenges the organization faced. Discusses the evolution of MassMEDIC's activities, from its formation in 1996 through 2004, and the views of different MassMEDIC stakeholders on the future direction of the organization. Provides detailed data about MassMEDIC and the Massachusetts medical device cluster to enable an evaluation of results and inform future direction.

  Keywords: Economic Growth; Industry Clusters; Nonprofit Organizations; Social and Collaborative Networks; Cooperation; Massachusetts;

  Citation:

  Emmons, Willis M., III, Michael E. Porter, and Spencer Wallace. "MassMEDIC: The Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council." Harvard Business School Case 706-498, July 2009. (Revised from original June 2006 version.)

  CiteView DetailsPurchase

  Related

• Case | HBS Case Collection | 2006 (Revised from original 1998 version)

  Clear Communications Ltd. vs. Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd. (A)

  Willis M. Emmons III and Martin Calles

  Features the challenges facing an entrant in the New Zealand telecommunications market during the period 1989-1994. Clear Communications Ltd. (CCL), a joint venture owned by Bell Canada, MCI, New Zealand Television Corp., and Todd Companies, begins offering long distance service in May 1991. The firm is dependent on access to the network of the incumbent, Telecom Corp. of New Zealand, to offer most of its services. This dependence proves to be a significant obstacle to CCL's expansion into the local business call market, particularly given New Zealand's unique "light-handed" regulatory system. Clear ultimately spends millions of dollars in a failed four-year lawsuit to obtain better terms of interconnection. In October 1994, CEO Andrew Makin must decide the future strategic direction of the firm.

  Keywords: Market Entry and Exit; Competition; Emerging Markets; Privatization; Monopoly; Wireless Technology; Corporate Strategy; Business or Company Management; Expansion; Law; Telecommunications Industry; New Zealand;

  Citation:

  Emmons, Willis M., III, and Martin Calles. "Clear Communications Ltd. vs. Telecom Corporation of New Zealand Ltd. (A)." Harvard Business School Case 798-085, December 2006. (Revised from original June 1998 version.)

  CiteView DetailsPurchase

  Related