
This thesis examines why and how managers of successful multiparty ventures achieve any given level of autonomy from venture partners. Interviews with venture managers and partners provide data for a comparative case study analysis of the evolution of two successful multi-party ventures whose autonomy developed on opposing trajectories – one ascending, the other descending. I argue that successful venture managers actively shape the degree of autonomy they attain in order to increase the venture's survival chances; that they do so by exploiting the two distinguishing features of joint ventures, their multilateral structure and the varied status set of the partners; and that adjusting their degree of autonomy helps venture managers mediate partner goal incongruity and mitigate the effects of partner dependence.
© Copyright 2005 President and Fellows of Harvard College