Research
Richard H.K. Vietor and Matthew C. Weinzierl
The United States is on a glide path to fiscal disaster, with experts projecting that the federal government will take in far less money than it spends--indefinitely. Our current fiscal policy is eroding competitiveness in several ways, and business conditions in the U.S. will deteriorate if there's no change in direction. The authors examine how fiscal policy relates to the three drivers of productivity: improving human capital, increasing physical capital (equipment or software, for example), and using these forms of capital more efficiently. Government spending for many public goods, such as education and infrastructure, contributes directly to one or more of them, whereas spending on health care and entitlements does little to enhance competitiveness directly. Taxes are needed to fund public goods, but they sometimes distort the allocation of human and physical capital. And large government deficits put upward pressure on the cost of borrowing for companies. The authors propose a plan--they call it "20/21 by 2021"--to reduce the deficit from 3.8% of GDP (the Congressional Budget Office's most likely scenario) to just over 1%.
Read the article here.
Read the working paper, "Macroeconomic Policy and U.S. Competitiveness", here.
Tags: Challenge, Macroeconomic Policy
At Harvard Business School, we believe it is important to foster an environment where visitors can share ideas and questions with us and each other. We invite you to join us in the conversation by following a few simple guidelines:
For more information on Harvard Business School's web properties, including intellectual property rights and restrictions on the use of materials, please view our Privacy Policy.

How has the U.S. political system affected your business recently?
(Read Professor David Moss's take on how to fix the U.S. political system in favor of U.S. competitiveness.)
Amid rancor, a chance for U.S. action on trade bill
23 May 2013 - Reuters
U.S. business groups are preparing to push for the bill, which would give the White House enhanced ability to negotiate trade deals and set out U.S. negotiating goals on issues ranging from cross-border electronic data flows to global supply chains and potentially even foreign currency practices.
New Study Shows U.S. Legal System is a Competitive Liability
22 May 2013 - New Study Shows U.S. Legal System is a Competitive Liability
The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform suggests that civil justice reform would play an important role in increasing the global competitiveness of American businesses.
Assailing corporations is a poor competitiveness strategy
20 May 2013 - The Hill
It is time for CEOs to stand up and say "yes, my company moves jobs to other nations and we will continue to do so until Congress puts in place a real national competitiveness strategy."
U.S. Competitiveness Project
Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field, Cotting House 106
Boston, MA 02163
Phone: 617.495.6155 Email: uscomp@hbs.edu
16 Feb 2012
Kiran Kadali
Macroeconomic policy and U.S. Competitiveness
Education is most important, education and research leads to innovation new ideas and products that would help us to stay ahead and competitive. Many Asian countries are having a leading edge over U.S. because there are more Graduates and Engineers graduating every year. Education in U.S. has become very expensive. The incentive for a graduate to complete his engineering and land into a job that would pay off his or her debt is slim. So, U.S. a change in macroeconomics to make education affordable by government providing 100% to 50% scholarship to smart students and for those who don???t quality providing direct loans to students at no interest if paid in first five years after graduation.
Kiran Kadali